Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 • <br /> Ericson stated that it could not,but the building itself could be wider,explaining that there was a 20 <br /> foot setback to the west. He stated,however,that this would not increase the function of the parking <br /> area or the building itself. <br /> Chair Peterson asked if there were plans to develop the secons. of in th ike Juaire stated <br /> they were preparing paperwork which would be submit sh• k <br /> Ericson stated that the lot was relatively flat but with a on, P oot chan• ele r • d g, <br /> providing channels and swales,and given the sandy con .a cy ofd ounds Vie •s ieved <br /> the property would drain but may result in standing vat •' sort period of tim II;*'our). <br /> Commissioner Kaden asked about the exterior lighting, 1.: + Q ed, was not indicated in the <br /> building plan revision. Mike Juaire stated that there was isting istingou,9 • ting for each entryway, <br /> and that floodlighting was planned for the back of cture. � <br /> mm## <br /> Ericson stated that plan will need to be sub • pri l cil c. l.faeration. <br /> Commissioner Braathen requested clan .tion of sti they to divert the water run-off. He <br /> asked if it would drain onto County ilid I, an. so,whelk:,'''from that point. <br /> Ericson stated that the driveway "ld be b : • to •moCi-rt the water to remain on the property, or <br /> diverted fro.c, ,he existing • • 1` to the 4 f4:.-d that the volume of run-off was minimal, <br /> and that - ; •ortio �� `,water • i absorbed before reaching County Road I. He <br /> statedth e y •ken to t5 9 ks Director Ulrich who agreed,and stated that the utilization <br /> of the ten ince - pipe iently accommodate the run-off. <br /> Commissionel,4 AE,•arkin•' Y. allowed on Woodlawn Drive. He stated that the applicant <br /> planned 0 • ace a p: ii ' 0, on the south side, and asked if there would be room for visitor <br /> parki <br /> B �aire stated that h. P elieved parking was restricted on one side of Woodlawn Drive. <br /> � wstated that 7 pplicant was required to provide only 2.5 parking spaces per unit, and was <br /> � E � � � ,t1i `de visitor parking. He agreed this level of parking may not be sufficient for an <br /> o 01: 9aefoii `t but visitors could park on the street prior to 2 a.m. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated that he is not satisfied with the landscaping plan and would like the <br /> site plan reviewed by the City Forester for additional plantings and landscaping design. He stated <br /> that it should be specified that some of the green area on the site plan contain plantings. <br /> • <br />