My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that he would have to research the expenses and would provide 1 <br />Council with an update on the details. He stated that they did have an audio system upgrade 2 <br />noting that he would clarify the details and update the Council. 3 <br /> 4 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. 5 <br /> 6 <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 7 <br /> 8 <br />8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 9 <br /> 10 <br />A. Resolution 6577 Approve 2004 Certified Annual Finance Report. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Aaron Nielsen, Audit Manager, thanked Staff for the assistance in the audit process. He 13 <br />referenced three documents including the Financial Statement, which was prepared by the City, 14 <br />the second is the Special Purpose document and the third document is the Management Report. 15 <br />He provided the Council with an overview of the Management Report noting that the report they 16 <br />issued is an unqualified opinion, which is the cleanest opinion they could provide. He reviewed 17 <br />the government auditing standards noting that they have no instances of non-compliance to 18 <br />report. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mr. Nielsen stated that in the final opinion they have identified three separate findings, one for 21 <br />claims and disbursements, one related to group insurance and one related to administrative 22 <br />penalties. He stated there are additional details included in the Special Purposes Audit Report. 23 <br />He stated that there were no changes in this years’ Significant Account Policies for this years 24 <br />report noting that this is the second year the City is reporting a financial document under the 25 <br />Gasby 34 Reporting model. He noted that under Audit Comments there are items identified 26 <br />during the process that they would like to see improvements made. He stated that it also includes 27 <br />suggestions that Staff could use to determine what would be most viable in their use for reporting 28 <br />purposes. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Mr. Nielsen referenced the resolution documentation noting that he does believe there is enough 31 <br />information presented to Council that allows them to identify and understand what is being 32 <br />presented and passed although in the minutes, what they read to identify what is happening there 33 <br />are certain cases where they are not clear on what is actually happening with respect to certain 34 <br />projects and how they would be financed. He stated that the other instances involve the bid and 35 <br />quote process for projects. He stated that they want to be sure that they are following the bid 36 <br />laws versus the less restrictive quote process. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mr. Nielsen noted page three moves into funding Cities in Minnesota and at the time of printing 39 <br />the report to make the June 30th deadline there wasn’t any finalized legislation to report on. He 40 <br />stated that they have identified the property taxes and have disclosed the market values in the 41 <br />cities have been increasing and reviewed the percentages with Council. He referenced page four 42 <br />noting that it presents a table and graph of the City of Mounds View property by type and 43 <br />reviewed the average tax rate noting that it was consistent with the rates in 2003. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.