My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />Mr. Nielsen noted page five and six discusses the governmental funds including the General 1 <br />Funds and it includes the revenue per capita in 2004. He reviewed the individual funds, general 2 <br />funds and cash balances with Council. He noted that City has been able to maintain and increase 3 <br />the cash and fund balances despite the legislative cuts, which is important with the size of the 4 <br />growth and the size of the operations. He stated that the overall impact to the General Fund was 5 <br />very close to the anticipated final budget and reviewed with Council. He referenced the 6 <br />Enterprise Funds stating that it has remained relatively stable noting that it has improved due to 7 <br />decreases in some of the contract agreements from 2003 to 2004. He stated that it is very 8 <br />important to monitor the utility rates to make sure they are charging a rate that would generate 9 <br />replacement costs and to cover the overhead costs. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mr. Nielsen stated that there was an improvement in the operating costs for 2004 over 2003 and 12 <br />reviewed with Council. He reviewed the Golf Course operating funds stating that it is an 13 <br />enterprise fund treated by the City. He stated that they did report a net increase in assets of 14 <br />$116,000 after reporting a reduction of net assets in 2003 of $248,000.00. He stated that the 15 <br />increase in assets is largely due to a transfer from the Community Capital Fund, as approved by 16 <br />Council, and also because of the billboard revenues. He stated that the improvement in 17 <br />operations helped the interfund borrowing between the Golf Course Fund and the Community 18 <br />Capital Project Fund by $37,000.00 this year. He reviewed the Citywide Financial Statement 19 <br />presentation noting that the Gasby 34 model does require a separate review of the financial 20 <br />statements as separate entities adding that there is an additional discussion and analysis included 21 <br />for their review. He stated that the City’s total net assets did increase by $2.3 million and 22 <br />reviewed the overall City activities. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Marty stated that this is a good report noting that the deadline for reporting was June 30th. 25 <br />He explained that the former Finance Director was concerned that the City would have to apply 26 <br />for an extension and asked if they were able to meet the deadline. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mr. Nielsen stated that they did apply for an extension but it was denied by the State. He stated 29 <br />that they worked hard to meet the June 30th deadline and it was submitted on time. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Flaherty referenced page 4, Schedule of Findings and Recommendations 32 <br />regarding the segregation of duties stating that it surprised him to see the recommendations that 33 <br />the City continue to segregate duties wherever it can adding that it was his thought that cross-34 <br />training was a good process and asked why they recommended further segregation of duties. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mr. Nielsen explained that there is a need to have someone separately reviewing and approving 37 <br />the work to ensure that it checks and balances. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked how they track payments to the sub contractors. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mr. Nielsen reviewed the tracking process noting that before making final payment to a general 42 <br />contractor a confirmation from the State must be received to ensure that all taxes have been 43 <br />deducted from their payroll checks. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.