Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich referenced the administrative penalties listed noting that the Police 1 <br />Department has been utilizing the administrative penalty process versus using the State Tickets 2 <br />for moving violations. He stated that a number of cities have discontinued this practice due to 3 <br />potential legal issues it could present adding that the Legislature was supposed to address this 4 <br />issue last year and never did. He stated that the City has continued with this process adding that 5 <br />the City should have the discussion as to whether this practice should be dropped from the Police 6 <br />Department. He indicated that this issue would be included as an agenda item for the September 7 <br />work session. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Marty asked if this process is now against the law. 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Attorney Riggs clarified that nothing has actually changed adding that there was supposed to 12 <br />be some legislation addressing this noting that it is being done on a piece mail process. He 13 <br />indicated that the City of Mounds View has been using this process for several years in addition 14 <br />to several other Cities who are still using this process. He noted that several Cities have 15 <br />discontinued using this process adding that this is something that Council should review and 16 <br />decide if this is an appropriate process to continue to use for traffic violations. He stated that the 17 <br />Courts are saying that the process should not be used adding that traffic offenses should run 18 <br />through the Minnesota Court process. He stated that this has not been definitively answered 19 <br />adding that this is something that Council should be aware of and review. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mr. Nielsen noted that he was reviewing the comment in Claims and Disbursements adding that 22 <br />he had confused it with another statutory requirement for contracts and clarified that what they 23 <br />are looking to ensure that the language is included within the contract and that the contractors are 24 <br />being paid in a timely fashion. 25 <br /> 26 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that the majority of the City’s contracts do include the language. 27 <br />He indicated that some of the outside engineering type situations did not include the language 28 <br />adding that this has been corrected. He explained that technically, statutorily, they are not 29 <br />required to have the language but they are subject to the requirement of filing a form IC134 30 <br />before final payment is paid. He stated that he and the League does recommends including this 31 <br />language into the contract so that it is consistent with what the auditor is saying. He stated that 32 <br />this has been done with the contracts where the City does have control of the drafting process. 33 <br /> 34 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas To Approve Resolution 6577 and waive the reading 35 <br />Approving the 2004 Certified Annual Finance Report. 36 <br /> 37 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 38 <br /> 39 <br />B. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing and Second Reading of Ordinance 760 Authorizing 40 <br />the Sale of Land Comprising The Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course to 41 <br />the Mounds View Economic Development Authority. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that on June 27, 2005 the Mounds View 44 <br />Economic Development Authority and the City Council considered and adopted the resolutions 45