My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br />this time and they wanted to know what they could do to change this. He explained that this is 1 <br />just a matter of information. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Thomas asked why this matter of information would be appropriate to this 4 <br />venue. She stated that having served on the Planning Commission she knows how to go about 5 <br />getting answers to a question as it would be brought forward and discussed with the Planning 6 <br />Commission to readdress the issues, should it be necessary. She stated that she does not believe 7 <br />that speaking for nameless individuals, who have recourse to do so with the Planning 8 <br />Commission, should they wish too. She stated that something seems inappropriate here noting 9 <br />that if the Planning Commissioners wish to readdress this with the Planning Commission she 10 <br />would encourage them to do so as this is the appropriate body to do that. She stated that to go to 11 <br />the Mayor and have the Mayor announce it at a meeting is not the proper forum. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty noted that he felt totally different about this in February adding that as things have 14 <br />come to fruition he began to believe that this is not the best deal for the City of Mounds View. 15 <br /> 16 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Gunn. To approve Resolution 6540 and waive the reading, 17 <br />Approving a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for The Bridges of Mounds View Golf 18 <br />Course Site. 19 <br /> 20 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Marty) Motion carried. 21 <br /> 22 <br />D. Resolution 6541 Accepting and Approving the Final Draft of The Bridges 23 <br />Office Development Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Document. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Director Ericson stated this item was authorized by the Economic Development Authority on 26 <br />September 13, 2004 as a means to address the potential development out at The Bridges Golf 27 <br />Course. He stated that the City authorized RLK/SYSCO to work on the AUAR, which they have 28 <br />done. He stated that they have published the preliminary and final drafts of the AUAR noting 29 <br />that the City has received a lot of positive feedback from agencies. He stated that there has been 30 <br />a lot of participation and teamwork coordination with the Cities of Blaine and Shoreview, Anoka 31 <br />County, Ramsey County, MnDOT, and the Department of Natural Resources. He stated that a lot 32 <br />of meetings were held and a lot of information was shared back and forth throughout the process. 33 <br />He stated that the area of primary concern, which was common across all agencies, was the 34 <br />transportation impacts given that County Road J does not function right now at peak 35 <br />performance. He stated that there are issues with regards to the deficiencies with the 36 <br />transportation system and RLK has put together a transportation impact plan. He noted that they 37 <br />have actually received some funding from the State of Minnesota to do some improvements to 38 <br />County Road J and the bridge over 35W. He stated that the AUAR documents are available for 39 <br />Council’s acceptance and approval. He indicated that earlier public meetings it was prefaced that 40 <br />the Council’s approval of this document does not, in any way, obligate the Council to take any 41 <br />action on the Medtronic development. He explained that it is simply is an assessment of the 42 <br />impact at the golf course if a development should occur. He stated that the issue is before 43 <br />Council again noting that the public hearing was held on May 23, 2005 and they are back for 44 <br />acceptance and approval of this document. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.