Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Thomas clarified that this is the same as the Spring Creek Regional Pond report 2 <br />and Council is just accepting the document they are giving the Council. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Carol Mueller stated she is very concerned about the impact study not including the residential 5 <br />streets. She stated that it is apparent that the feeling was that the main access roads would be 6 <br />County J, Central Avenue, 35W and US Highway 10 noting that she believes the new employees 7 <br />in town would use the inner streets including Silver Lake Road, Long Lake Road, and Red Oak 8 <br />Drive. She stated that she is very concerned that they do not have the means to enforce and 9 <br />control the speeds. She stated that people run stop signs as it is and with the potential for 10 <br />additional 3000 to 6000 vehicles on their streets she believes this is something that definitely 11 <br />should be reviewed and considered. She stated that she really hopes that with the improvements 12 <br />the City is planning to do on County Road J that the City would consider repairing the potholes 13 <br />and the existing roads. She asked that the City not narrow the roads and plan to do serious traffic 14 <br />controls to make sure the streets are still safe for the pedestrian residents. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Director Ericson stated that Ms Mueller brings up some good points noting that the City did ask 17 <br />RLK to examine the transportation impacts not only on a regional transportation basis but also 18 <br />for the internal road system within Mounds View. He stated that given the proximity to 35W, 19 <br />US Highway 10, Highway 65 and County Road J that it would be highly unlikely that there 20 <br />would be any appreciable impact to the Mounds View roadways. He agreed that there could be 21 <br />some people, who live in New Brighton or other surrounding areas, that could use internal street 22 <br />systems but it would be unlikely that they would try to navigate through the residential areas 23 <br />rather than utilize another easier traveled roadway. He stated that the bottom line with the RLK 24 <br />memo, that was included in the Council packet that they believe that any local traffic would be 25 <br />negligible adding that if there are concerns with a lot of traffic going into Mounds View that 26 <br />maybe some of these people would stop at local businesses to make purchases. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Thomas noted Ms. Mueller’s comments stating that this is a problem the City 29 <br />would have to address regardless. She assured Ms. Mueller that the Council has talked a lot 30 <br />about the residential road problems noting that no matter what goes on with the improvements 31 <br />for County Road J it is something the Council does have to review. 32 <br /> 33 <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road asked if the billboards should support a golf course or 34 <br />should the golf course support itself. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Marty stated that if the golf course can’t support itself due to lawsuits and bonds the City 37 <br />then has to find another way to finance it so that the residents aren’t taxed for it. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Mr. Jahnke stated that he does not personally believe that using the excuse that the City lost the 40 <br />lawsuit that it should make a difference after ten years. He stated that every business experiences 41 <br />bumps adding that his question was not answered. He asked if the City believes that billboards 42 <br />should support a golf course. He stated that figures show that the golf course won’t support itself 43 <br />without the billboards. 44 <br /> 45