Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />Commissioner Berke stated that this type of facility would likely re <br />employees, but noted that even with that many employees, and 48 re <br />members, the available parking would be inadequate. He added that <br />would also be reduced. He stated that given the amours >°fpace indicat <br />overflow into the street and asked if there was room to pr..de more <br />that there was room for the addition of 6-8 more stalls, that theid not be <br />necessary. <br />July 7, 1999 <br />Page 15 <br />Commissioner Berke stated that the site plan indicated 22 parking stalls, and asked how many <br />employees the applicant would be anticipating. Mr. Pinkerton stated that they would be working <br />rotating shifts, but that there would probably be 12-14 at peak times, with an avge of 8-10. <br />2Rt�V <br />er number of <br />th visiting family <br />the parking space <br />vehicles wou <br />erton <br />Ericson stated that the parking space provided does meet th <br />use. Commissioner Berke stated that his understanding was thai <br />care for senior residential housing, and that at least hay pf the stalls: <br />which would leave very few stalls for visitors. Mr. Pk stated th <br />four unit facilities with 10-11 parking stalls, andi inys st nit facilities w <br />1�it�.:>�. <br />stated that these numbers were based upon Oiler facilts <br />stated that staff could research what other cities and ither <br />that what the Code requires is in line„,?th the expected de* <br />g than bat indicat to facilities have a greater demand for pr r <br />homes and similar types of facilitie; they coul <br />reflect that. <br />Carol <br />home. Sh <br />that staff wa <br />more employee <br />be utilizin <br />answer <br />that <br />wa <br />s : s time. Hey <br />"..eeigi. e <br />ry problematic foi <br />ire <br />a <br />d be <br />erequirement for this type of <br />as a much higher ratio of <br />,taken up by the staff, <br />-ad developed twenty- <br />15-16 parking stalls. He <br />size and their usage. Ericson <br />&in the area utilize, to be certain <br />He stated that if assisted living <br />by the Code requirements for nursing <br />require more parking space and amend the Code to <br />49 La.:: ive, statedrthat she was employed by a nursing/assisted living <br />II <br />they v*dents in that facility, and 215 to 250 employees. She stated <br />,W <br />or all a41�.�� t business, and added that the applicant would require <br />ticipateie asked what type of payment provider the facility would <br />ed thathey were researching the matter, but did not have all of the <br />ever, that they were attempting to keep the price range at a rate <br />Mrs. Holden stated that the parking at her place of employment <br />e employees and the family members who visited the residents. <br />olden asked if 11.1, facility would have private rooms. Mr. Pinkerton stated that, at present it <br />gned to .. all private rooms, adding that they may consider some duplex -style rooms, <br />t l e the sharing of some of the corner units. Mrs. Holden asked if they would be <br />c. m ed couples as residents. Mr. Pinkerton stated that they would. Mrs. Holden stated <br />that she ved directly across the street and could see the project from her front door. She stated her <br />support for the project. <br />Mike Grommesh, 2698 Lake Court Drive, stated that a residential facility of some sort in that lot <br />was far preferable to anything else he could think of. He stated that his main concern was the parking <br />issue. He stated that he had three family members in nursing homes, and that parking always seemed <br />