Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />July 7, 1999 • <br />Page 16 <br />to be an issue because there was never enough provided in the original plan. He asked how many <br />square feet the lot and the footprint of the building were comprised of. <br />Mike Lewis, Development Director for MSP Real Estate, stated that the l:t area slightly more <br />than 70,000 square feet, and the footprint of the building was-16,00. #'eet in area. Mr. <br />Grommesh asked how much of this space would be devoted t ,a <;:; king. x> :::. s stated that there <br />M <br />`�Y'a.+ 4, ate. ?f <br />were 23 car stalls, but was uncertain as to the square foot Mr. Gro <tn:quired regardi.zg <br />the size of the individual apartments. Mr. Lewis stated that t ey would `angt :2.90 an20 <br />square feet in area. aa4 <br />Q <br />"' "''``' <br />Mr. Grommesh stated that the entrance was another concer�;3ztr �•,that the intersection of Mounds <br />View Drive and County Road I was a very dangerous one. <br />yY tj <br />be researched very carefully. He asked if there were oeer su <br />comparable in parking that they could look at. Mr. Perton statev <br />of this type in the State of Minnesota. He stated kr v, .re constr <br />Wisconsin, which was not yet completed. <br />Mr. Grommesh asked if the facility would be private y fund <br />tat the traffic concerns should <br />es in Minnesota that are <br />was their first project <br />-a facility in Greenville, <br />ax Increment Funds or other <br />funding would be utilized. Mr. Pinkgtdif stated at the fao4it was completely privately funded. <br />Mr. Grommesh asked the applicapy if he cc <br />neighboring residents' view Mr Pinkertox' <br />imately <br />S room. <br />lined with <br />that wo <br />street. Mr` <br />did not plan t <br />view of the buil <br />Mr <br />this <br />res <br />b <br />rative fen <br />Id probably be <br />s, it may qualify. <br />ould be a 24-hou <br />facility level. <br />ed an assist <br />ow the facility would appear from the <br />the patio itself would be a half -oval shape <br />eight. He stated that there would be a trellis g <br />Grommesh asked how far the patio was from the <br />est distance was approximately 30 feet. He added that they <br />e rear of the building. Mr. Pinkerton stated that the rear <br />at of the front. <br />be classified as a skilled nursing facility. Mr. Pinkerton stated that <br />el less than a skilled facility, but added that with the Alzheimer's <br />stied that the target market had not been fully determined at this time, <br />care facility. Council Member Stigney requested clarification regarding the <br />r. Pinkerton stated that it depended on their market, but it would be <br />living facility, not a skilled nursing facility. He stated that there would be a <br />'staff, rather than a full-time nurse as a skilled nursing facility might have. <br />Commissioner Stevenson asked if the exterior would be consistent with the senior home located <br />across the street. Mr. Pinkerton stated that the brick would be toned down a bit, and the building <br />would be cream and beige in color with a green roof. Commissioner Stevenson stated that he was <br />concerned that, in light of the senior home located less than a block away, they would have too many <br />incongruent building types in that area. Mr. Pinkerton stated that he would look into that matter. <br />• <br />• <br />