Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 18, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> • <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes <br /> A. July 21, 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Kaden to approve the July 21, 1999 meeting minutes.>: :Icorrected. <br /> ss,�x. <br /> zF\z'zz?�\ : <br /> Ayes—6 Nays—0 A\ Th is h carried. <br /> hil <br /> 5 PlanningCase No. 566-99 =:? rAir }` _>.r h. < >. ; <br /> ? <br /> r. <br /> Property Involved: 2809 Woodale Drive .'. •" ri. 4 .z <br /> : <br /> P Y :: .a . <br /> Consideration of Resolution 590-99, a resolution recomm q. : 1a1 of a conditional use permit <br /> for a garage expansion. :. ri : <br /> Applicant: Tim Skeate. s <br /> The applicant was not present. ;�t;. ; _ I;< :, ,.SOlk, f <br /> ..'fix' .n�:ir ?�; � ...,,..A P' <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the sta 'report afollows: ` :t;a« <br /> ,:61iie so <br /> AN: 0 <br /> This applicant has requested a cond` inal use> rmit for.**expanded garage to be located at 2809 <br /> 0 `53,4`.< <br /> Woodale Drive. The applica, t las>rpropostkincr ' `the size of the existing garage from 720 <br /> square feet t' .; 296 square:"WO. >A`'icson stat t a' >fh riast meeting, the Planning Commission and <br /> „Alstaff ha zs Fssed that l sp., at 4004 ; re feet, would be substantially smaller than the <br /> ro osec ig e:, : 0 : <-:11, <br /> p P VV., <br /> � : <br /> ,;?> i 4001115•14- <br /> Ericson <br /> im.:`..: . .Ericson stated the pip oed 1,296:.x:.;ua .:foot garage would, in fact, be three times larger than the <br /> house. He stat 1' _,Commi on and City Council have in the past, been very concerned <br /> about thi , ,Aie of imbila ::; e:;stated a _ara•e is intended to be an accessory structure to service <br /> the p •.l"opal dwelling, rigta h oininating feature of the property. He stated, while there is no <br /> req ' �z?° p <br /> ent that a garage tiller than the house, a garage of this size, were it to be built, would <br /> as:Far�r out of place and ttrusive. <br /> SR <br /> , ' <br /> stated staff>4d the Planning Commission reviewed the adverse effects associated with this <br /> :`,:s,::.d:..ha , ttermined that the proposed expansion would be substantially out of character <br /> ,:n. TIRipiliood, could cause blight upon the neighborhood, and would tend to depreciate the <br /> area' itv is it is located. <br /> Ericson stated, in light of the findings associated with the adverse effects and general conditional use <br /> permit criteria, the Planning Commission, at its last meeting on August 4, 1999, directed staff to <br /> prepare Resolution 590-99, a resolution recommending denial of the conditional use permit request. 0 <br />