Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 18, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> iActing Chair Miller inquired if staff had discussed the resolution recommending denial of the request <br /> with the applicant. Ericson stated staff has been in contact with the applicant, who is aware that the <br /> request faces a recommendation of denial by the Planning Commission. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Berke. To Approve Resolution No. 590-99, 4 Resolution <br /> Recommending Denial of a Conditional Use Permit For an Oversized Garage at 2809cSodale Drive; <br /> Mounds View Planning Case No. 552-99. ask -- <br /> t <br /> .4.:017:::$:,,,:::44, <br /> A es 5 Nays— 1 (Her t. motion carried. <br /> xmia <br /> Am- <br /> E !' 1 <br /> :. .::::i�'':.:::�-"',>''�.��,.� Ate: <br /> Commissioner Hegland stated he did not think the PlanningCommis ion shoo` di .urage:K ople <br /> 4.0A Ar from improving theirproperty, and he believed this to b an im rovement. "' ' . :. ° <br /> Otingle"' .4200, <br /> 6. Planning Case No. 559-99 ``` <' '"```' <,. <br /> Property Involved: 2670 County Road I <.::00>::;: <br /> Consideration of Resolution 584-99, a resolution lw 00,approva ` 'a conditional use permit <br /> for an assisted living senior residential faeil ty; a rezoning rdinan e`(Ordinance 631); and an <br /> ordinance amending the Zoning Code pertaining topriditkialliboOlthin the R-4 Zoning District. <br /> Applicant: MSP Real Estate .:: gr'Q° <br /> III <br /> gy-A,* <br /> ,.,, <br /> 4gY ow <br /> w it <br /> > >A <br /> The applicant was present. aw "" .{ <br /> Planning :''ss>':>ia-a Erics6leggillw staff report<a follows: <br /> The Planning Plannint*Ohirmssion has`il eo<athis request at several previous meetings. Ericson stated <br /> Resolution 584 },.x,.,as,the result: o ,those many meetings and their discussions, as well as the <br /> ir <br /> information d. h't;_.;:,embers of the Commission,staff and the applicant. <br /> 'Afi,a7- litigete„ <br /> Ericso:.; a ea ere were`< 'er. mponents to the resolution. He stated the resolution recommends <br /> wtr <br /> appy oval of the condition. us permit, and adoption of an ordinance approving the rezoning of the <br /> r�:;: �� <br /> prty from B-2, Limited Business, to R-4, High Density Residential. He stated another <br /> compnent of the resolution is the recommendation to adopt an ordinance that clarifies the language <br /> iffigOion 1109.04 ofhe City Code, as it pertains to nursing homes and other similar group housing <br /> he .,• distri <br /> :.: ct. He stated this ordinance includes an additional stipulation that the <br /> p=`: '' � :se; <br /> w:., ypes of uses shall be examined, and rather than basing this requirement upon that <br /> set �tnhe City Code, the requirement may be increased depending upon the level and intensity <br /> of service being provided. <br /> Ericson stated the applicant has provided a revised site plan, which indicates both entrances to the <br /> property to be located on Mounds View Drive. He stated staff has indicated to the applicant that this <br /> 0 would probably not be a good situation for people exiting the property onto Mounds View Drive, in <br />