09-01-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission August 18, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 6 member, on the maximum shift. Ericson stated that Item I of Ordinance 639 discusses the parking • requirements. He stated, rather than the parking requirement be subject to the Council's discretion, as presently indicated, the requested amendment could be made to this item. Ericson noted the parking requirements would be subject to review under the conditional use permit. Commissioner Laube stated if the requirement was indicated in the ordinance, it would provide a standard for these types of uses in the future. Acting Chair Miller stated this requirement did not take visitorparkingsideration. Ericson stated the visitor parking was represented within the stall t beratio. v' xv400ssiy ?or vaisak Council Liaison Stigney stated that some rooms could have more thane>ione be "`iinqui ,e:d" this Hen '>. 'r ants. ote �";` :.:,::>»>>;<>: n had had been taken into consideration in terms of the parkinrui e .: th ,�l�� t indicated some of the rooms might contain more than o4voi ricson stated thatd✓<requirement should be based upon the number of beds, as this would al e the equirement for other facilities, .. :.: which might have several beds per room. vx n;<,... WitaiEricson inquired if there were any further questi4o inc rding Ord `!>31, pertaining to the rezoning of the property. Acting Chair Millerutt . te languag "the ordinance could be amended to state "The Council may act...". mmiss ner Ka n inquired if the language could be .:.;,:` •LSA, `�:zf��'�;+::fi'y`�:::..::::r>:;,25*c.>'. amended after the Commission took action on the orcd z nc > n o <stated it could. He added the Planning Commission could indicate that Section 3' of the ordinance "may be amended prior to Council adoption," in the resolutionrecommending approval. Acting Chair Miller explained the Council might wish to make additional change > o Ordinance 631, as it was subject to their action. • Alt AtiV • Ericson statedthe resolutioncoo` ld also iimar A,a<`st pulation which states, "Now therefore, be it further res l ed t at nor<to tet, by the Cityuncil, the applicant will submit a revised site plan which sh` £`e ccess ontotalk::. : oad I, and the number of parking stalls that the Commission has indicatedaas a r s riate. : _;: _•<... wysthr Carol Golden:,o9 .:*Court Drive,inquired how the applicant would control the entering and exiting to;n `propeNO : wifstated theywould probablyutilize a sign, which indicates no entry >fnq • on CountyRoad � .. i emergency vehicles would-b-e a• - • - proy. Mr. Lewis stated`stere would be sufficient room for this, at the southwest corner of the p. ` ►g lot. tOs :$Obert, 8315 Greenwood Drive, inquired regarding the proposed rezoning from B-2 to R-4, and consideration to the small amount of zoned business space left within the City. 6 � ,AQ-. :'> were all aware, commercial zoning generates more tax dollars for the City, which f wo Iiivrovide relief to the property owners. He inquired regarding the difference in tax generation, in terms of an R-4 use, and a typical B-2 business. He stated they should make the City attractive for businesses to come in, operate, and be successful. He noted the impending revision to the Comprehensive Plan, and stated he considered the rezoning of property to be a very serious matter. 4110