Laserfiche WebLink
Johnson Variance Application <br /> 2075 &2081 Hillview Road <br /> September 11, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1107.03 of the Zoning Code, pertaining to zero lot line subdivisions. While not the same thing, the <br /> manner by which a zero lot line subdivision would be similar to how the applicant's request could <br /> be handled. Under Subdivision 4 of that Section, certain deed restrictions are listed which would <br /> need to be filed upon both properties, which are as follows: <br /> a. If one dwelling unit is burned or destroyed, it shall be reconstructed in a uniform <br /> appearance. <br /> b. If both dwelling units are burned or destroyed, minimum lot widths shall then prevail as <br /> for single-family homes. <br /> c. A double dwelling unit may be re-built meeting the original conditions of this Title. <br /> d. A uniform exterior appearance, in terms of color, design and maintenance shall be <br /> maintained <br /> For the applicant's request, if a variance were to be approved, deed restrictions would need to be <br /> filed which would apply to the garage structures in the event of fire or if one of or both or the <br /> properties were to be sold in the future. In speaking with the City Attorney, however, it was <br /> concluded that this approach--albeit possible--may not be the most appropriate in this situation. • <br /> The other possible option to allow for this type of structure would be to require that the applicant <br /> join, or"combine", the two parcels into one parcel. This process is fairly straightforward, and only <br /> requires that the taxes payable for the current year be paid. There is no County fee to join parcels. <br /> This process has been used in the past without any problems, and can be seen on the Mermaid Site, <br /> the Silver Lake Commons multi-family complex, as well as other multi-lot parcels. While in most <br /> cases it would be preferable to replat the parcels to make one"platted" lot,joining the applicant's <br /> two parcels would not appear to cause any problems and would alleviate any issues resulting from <br /> property lines or the future sale of the property. (Once the properties are joined, they could only be <br /> "un-joined" by_ eans-af-a-minor-subdivision hich the Planning Commission_and_CoiInca would <br /> need to approve.) <br /> Staff has spoken to the applicant, who has indicated that he would be willing to join the properties <br /> in lieu of requesting a variance. A copy of the lot combination application is attached for your <br /> reference. Once joined, there would be no reason the applicant could not proceed with his plans <br /> for the garage construction. <br /> Staff would recommend, however, that the City Code, in Section 1202.10 pertaining to land <br /> subdivisions be amended to explicitly allow for such combinations. The Subdivision Code does <br /> not contemplate simple combinations, only subdivisions. The City Attorney has suggested the <br /> following italicized and underlined words be added: <br /> 1202.10: LAND DIVISION OR COMBINATION PROCEDURE: In any case where the 41° <br />