Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 28 <br /> <br />F. Policy for Removal of Nonconforming Street Accesses – Messiah Lutheran 1 <br />Church Case 2 <br /> 3 <br />Public Works Director Lee reviewed that at the June 6, 2005, Council Work Session, staff 4 <br />presented a request submitted by the Messiah Lutheran Church to have the City remove the head-5 <br />in parking lot located along the west side of Knollwood Drive, just south of County Road H2. 6 <br />As part of the report, staff recommended that should the Council wish to proceed with this 7 <br />request, a policy be created to allow for the City to remove nonconforming street access before 8 <br />performing any work at Messiah Lutheran Church. On June 13, 2005, the Council approved 9 <br />Resolution 6556, which authorized the prohibition of parking on Knollwood Drive. However 10 <br />this has not resolved the problem so another letter was submitted by the Messiah Lutheran 11 <br />Church requesting that the City post “No Parking” signs along both sides of Knollwood Drive 12 <br />from County Road H2, south 360 feet to the south end of their property. Those signs have since 13 <br />been installed. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Councilmember Flaherty suggested this decision be delayed until after the street improvement 16 <br />project has been determined and approved. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Public Works Director Lee advised that the church has indicated that cars are still parking head-19 <br />in and backing onto Knollwood Drive. He stated from a legal standpoint, is it in the City’s best 20 <br />interest to remove this non-conforming parking area that is within the City’s right-of-way. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Councilmember Thomas noted that there is a significant safety concern and asked about the 23 <br />investment of the City’s time and money. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director Lee estimated $1,600 to $1,800. He advised there are limited sight 26 <br />distances and a crosswalk is located near by. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mayor Marty stated that he understands there is a safety issue involved but the street 29 <br />improvement may not occur for several years. He stated maybe the City should take out the 30 <br />asphalt and put in black dirt and seed instead of sodding since the street may be redone. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if the church is only asking to have the asphalt removed. Public 33 <br />Works Director Lee stated that is correct and noted the policy, as prepared, would indicate it 34 <br />would also be sodded. However, that can be taken out. He stated if approved, the $1,600 would 35 <br />be funded by the Street Improvement Fund. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mayor Marty stated the franchise fee this year has resulted in at least that much money. 38 <br /> 39 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Stigney. To direct staff to remove the asphalt area and let the 40 <br />church take it from there and to table consideration of the draft a policy until the street 41 <br />reconstruction issue is again discussed. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Councilmember Flaherty noted that it is illegal for cars to park in this location. Public Works 44 <br />Director Lee clarified that the “No Parking” signs are in the parallel area and the area of concern 45