Agenda Packets - 2005/09/26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 29 is off the street where they park head-in. 1 2 Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Flaherty) Motion carried. 3 4 G. Proposal to Stripe County Crosswalks 5 6 Mayor Marty stated he spoke with County Commissioners Tony Bennett and Jan Wiessner about 7 this today and mentioned that the stripes by the senior housing needs to be repainted. He 8 reported that Commissioner Bennett had indicated County crosswalks are on a time schedule for 9 painting but due to the fact that it is over due and by senior housing, those stripes could be done 10 relatively soon. Mayor Marty stated that he would like this item tabled until the County 11 addresses the other cross walks. In addition, he is concerned about the precedent that would be 12 set if City staff starts painting County crosswalks. 13 14 Councilmember Thomas suggested this topic be discussed again at the September 12, 2005 15 meeting. 16 17 City Administrator Ulrich reported that he spoke with Commissioner Bennett’s assistant who 18 indicated it has been referred to the County Public Works Department. He stated staff will put it 19 on the September 12, 2005 meeting agenda for an update. 20 21 H. Resolution 6601 Awarding a Construction Contract for the Emergency 22 Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Installation Project 23 24 Public Works Director Lee advised that two bids were received and the low bid is from Eagan 25 Companies, Inc. in the amount of $61,095. The City’s engineering consultant had estimated 26 $40,000 and submitted a note of explanation of why, in their opinion, their estimate was off from 27 the quote received. 28 29 Public Works Director Lee stated he is presenting three options for the Council’s consideration: 30 Award the bid to Egan Companies in the amount of $61,095, reject bids and direct staff to re-bid 31 the project, or reject the bids and cancel the project. 32 33 Mayor Marty stated that today he spoke at length with Public Works Director Lee on this subject. 34 He said he had asked who did the job at Rockford and also asked about Ramsey County’s 35 preferred contractors. 36 37 Public Works Director Lee stated Ramsey County reviewed the proposed contractors and 38 developed a list of acceptable contractors for EVP systems. Option 2, to reject and re-bid, could 39 result in getting a bid from a contractor that is not acceptable with Ramsey County and would 40 involve showing justification of why that contractor should be considered. The City’s 41 engineering consultant analyzed the costs to reject and re-bid, and determined there is a 42 possibility of getting a bid of maybe 10% ($6,000) less. The estimated cost to re-bid is about 43 $2,000. Another consideration is a legal issue should the bids be rejected and there happens to 44 be an incident at one of these intersections; would the City have more liability because it decided 45