Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 12, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Gunn. To approve the deployment of Jeremiah Anderson, fire 2 <br />personnel, to Louisiana. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Stigney reiterated that Mounds View is not Blaine or Spring Lake Park and there 5 <br />are only two contributing members from Mounds View. He noted we are understaffed and Mr. 6 <br />Anderson will be sorely missed. Councilmember Stigney stated he sympathizes with New 7 <br />Orleans but asking Minnesota to respond is a long distance. He stated he is not talking about 8 <br />sending the equipment, but the personnel so he will not support the motion. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Marty stated he supports the motion as the City’s contribution. 11 <br /> 12 <br /> Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Fire Chief Zikmund stated they will be finalizing the ground breaking date and will inform the 15 <br />City Manager of that decision. 16 <br /> 17 <br />D. Resolution 6615 Establishing a Preliminary 2006 Budget and Levy 18 <br /> 19 <br />City Administrator Ulrich advised that State law requires that the City certify a proposed 2006 20 <br />General Fund Budget and proposed 2006 property tax levy to Ramsey County by September 15, 21 <br />2005. This matter was last discussed at the September 6, 2005 Work Session. He reviewed that 22 <br />the City Council had directed Staff to use a preliminary total levy increase of 8%, which includes 23 <br />all special levies. It was the Council’s desire to retain some flexibility by setting a preliminary 24 <br />rate at 8%. Once this amount is set, the levy could not be increased. The Council has indicated a 25 <br />desire to reduce the final levy below 8%. 26 <br /> 27 <br />City Administrator Ulrich advised the proposed 2006 base property tax levy is $3,814,064, 28 <br />special levies are $331,337, for a total net property tax levy of $4,145.401. Based upon last 29 <br />Council direction, the levy was brought down from 12% to 8% for the preliminary levy. He 30 <br />explained that for the reduction, Staff considered four components: increase the franchise 31 <br />revenue by $55,000; reduce City Council contingency to $58,000; remove the electronic bulletin 32 <br />board from the general fund budget and put it into the special project budget; and non work comp 33 <br />insurance deductible saves the City $25,000. 34 <br /> 35 <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained this is the preliminary levy and the final levy would be 36 <br />approved in December. During that time, the levy could be lowered but not increased so the cap 37 <br />would be 8%. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if it was the Council direction to set the preliminary levy at 8%. 40 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated it was discussed at the Council Work Session. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he supports a cap of 5% and at the Work Session, 43 <br />Councilmember Flaherty had supported a cap of 4%. 44 <br /> 45