My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:29 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Fire Chief Zikmund thanked the Council for this action and advised that this matter will go to the 4 <br />Spring Lake Park Council next week and Blaine City Council on October 6. He invited all to 5 <br />attend the ceremonial ground breaking on October 11 at 5 p.m. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Fire Chief Zikmund reported that the Blaine City Council did approve the bid for the purchase of 8 <br />two fire engines and awarded the contract to General Safety Equipment. Staff will probably take 9 <br />both engines since they will include some additional features if both are ordered. 10 <br /> 11 <br />On the EMAC request, Fire Chief Zikmund advised that staff continues to be in stand down 12 <br />mode and no further action has been requested. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Marty asked the Fire Chief to pass on the City’s appreciation to the Fire Department for 15 <br />their work after the storm. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Fire Chief Zikmund reported the Fire Department had responded to 70 calls during that 14 hour 18 <br />period or 15% of their total volume. The only serious call was a structure collapse but the state 19 <br />patrol officer who lived in that area had already rescued the lady. 20 <br /> 21 <br />D. Consideration of Resolution 6636, a Resolution Approving a Minor 22 <br />Subdivision of 7851 Spring Lake Road 23 <br /> 24 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that Donald Olson has requested approval 25 <br />to subdivide his lot located at 7851 Spring Lake Road. As proposed, the subdivision would split 26 <br />off the rear 255 feet of 7851 Spring Lake Road, creating a land-locked lot. Mr. Olson resides at 27 <br />2933 Oakwood Drive, directly south of the proposed new lot, and would like the new lot added 28 <br />to his Oakwood Drive parcel to provide more backyard space. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director Ericson noted the proposed subdivision is in the form of a Registered Land Survey. In 31 <br />this case, there are four tracts of land created by the subdivision. Tract A runs the length of 7851 32 <br />Spring Lake Road and ranges in width from 7 feet to 16 feet. It would be deeded to the owner to 33 <br />the north at 7865 Spring Lake Road. That will correct a 16 foot discrepancy between the plated 34 <br />lines of the subdivision and where the monuments are located. Tract B is an eight foot wide strip 35 <br />along the front of 7851 Spring Lake Road. This would be deeded to the City as Spring Lake 36 <br />Road right-of-way. Tract C is the improved remainder of that lot while Tract D would be the 37 <br />back of the lot, to be added to 2933 Oakwood Drive where Mr. Olson has his home. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Director Ericson advised this property was reviewed by the Planning Commission and it found 40 <br />the remaining lot satisfies all regulations. Tract D would satisfy all requirements if fronting 41 <br />right-of-way but it does not front full right-of-way so the City is requesting a deed restriction be 42 <br />added that would indicate “Tract D does not constitute an independent buildable lot and shall not 43 <br />be developed for any purpose other than typical accessory uses implied or expressly permitted by 44 <br />the Mounds View Zoning Code.” He advised that the City Attorney’s office has reviewed this 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.