My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:40 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/24/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/24/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> <br />have expressed an interest lose that interest once they see the property and realize that there is 1 <br />shared access with Walgreen’s and has an odd shaped lot. He stated that Staff has really worked 2 <br />to get something in this location adding that he is not going to make any promises but he believes 3 <br />that they can get a restaurant but it won’t be this year or at this location. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Gunn clarified that Dr. Belting is proposing to take an empty piece of land that 6 <br />has been sitting there empty for almost five years, with no usage at all, and is willing to build an 7 <br />office building that provide the City with more tax base and improve the appearance of the 8 <br />property. She stated that she would encourage Dr. Belting to go for it. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that this piece of property has been a thorn in her side since this 11 <br />whole thing started. She recalled that she was the lone voice against the land swap that created 12 <br />that development in the beginning because she didn’t think it was necessary to swap the land that 13 <br />allowed it to switch over. She stated that she did not think this was a good use of City property 14 <br />at that time noting that she did support the development agreement in the end because it had the 15 <br />restaurant. She indicated that this was the general consensus of everyone at that time was to 16 <br />agree to the restaurant noting that as soon as the restaurant deal fell through she knew it would 17 <br />not happen. She stated that once a deal like this falls apart you cannot come in afterwards and 18 <br />develop the property as a retrofit. She stated that she is excited that someone wants to build on 19 <br />this property and put it to a good use. She stated that it fits with the concept of the corner and is 20 <br />very excited to see the property go to a good purpose. She stated that this is one more business 21 <br />and is all for it. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Stigney stated that if Dr. Belton could find some other space to build his office 24 <br />building he would be all for it but this property was set up for a PUD with one purpose and that 25 <br />is a restaurant. He stated that it has been sitting there for four and half years and with Medtronic 26 <br />coming in other opportunities for a restaurant could present itself. He suggested leaving it as it is 27 <br />and see what happens in the next four to five years. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Marty stated that he is aware that City Staff has been working very hard in trying to bring 30 <br />a restaurant to this location noting that Culvers had considered the location but eventually 31 <br />changed their minds. He stated that Staff has tried hard to attract other restaurants adding that he 32 <br />honestly does not believe it is going to happen. He stated that he sees this as a positive asset to 33 <br />the City noting that it signals that the owner is in it for the long haul. He stated that he does not 34 <br />have a problem with this proposal and would support the request. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Flaherty further clarified his position stating that he does not have anything 37 <br />against Dr. Belting and explained that he does not like looking out the City Hall window and 38 <br />seeing the Walgreen’s sign. He stated that he would never have agreed to the Walgreen’s 39 <br />development noting that he would have preferred to see this area be developed as a hub and 40 <br />differentiate itself from the rest of the City. He stated that it is his feeling that if the City were to 41 <br />develop this area further that it would clutter the area and the City Hall would be amongst 42 <br />commercial buildings. He stated that he likes green space and would like to see if there is an 43 <br />opportunity or possibility for something to be worked out at the newest building in the City. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.