My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/10/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:40 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 12:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/24/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/24/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the funds would come from the Special Projects Fund. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Stigney asked how much money is actually in the Special Projects Fund. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that there is approximately $3.4 million in the Special Projects 6 <br />Fund. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty stated that it has already been decided that insulation in the ceiling; new duct work; 9 <br />roof work; outside wall/exterior work; the Police Department has to be changed around and re-10 <br />wired; bathrooms; public counters; and the basement are all areas that have been identified as 11 <br />items within the base plan, that has to be done. He stated that when S.E.H. first came out they 12 <br />had a beautiful, totally redesigned building for $3.5 million and the City cannot afford it or need 13 <br />it. He stated that a resident suggested utilizing funds from the Cable Fund to pay for the roof air 14 <br />conditioner and the re-wiring of the video room as a way to help pay for the overall project. He 15 <br />agreed that line items should be included before it goes out for bid and should definitely be 16 <br />included with the final packet. He stated that the plans and specifications should be more 17 <br />specific and asked that Staff include the detail for their final review. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that as part of the report S.E.H. put together, they did go 20 <br />through the building and identify window treatment and furniture but it was not included in the 21 <br />bids. He explained that they were identified as needs but not included in the bids. He stated that 22 <br />the Fund balance is $3,458,000.00 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Stigney referenced the $3,458,000 and asked what is allocated for expenditures 25 <br />and scoped out for expenditure that should be included and detailed. He asked what is in this 26 <br />fund, dedicated to what item that would be considered necessary for this project. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mary Berg explained that at this point in time it is on the books as undesignated. She explained 29 <br />that normally they do set aside designated and undesignated items. She stated that if there were 30 <br />discussions, at a much higher level, as to what the future plans and projects are; she is not privy 31 <br />to this information and cannot speak for it. She confirmed that this is not a fund that gets added 32 <br />to on a regular basis so when it is touched they should be careful and use the funds wisely. She 33 <br />stated that she would get back to the Council with any information made available to her. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Stigney asked Director Ericson to clarify what uses the City has identified for 36 <br />the future where they could use this to lower the tax base. He expressed concerns stating that the 37 <br />City gets hit by the State every time the City has unreserved funds. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Director Ericson stated that Staff would pull the information together and provide to Council for 40 <br />review. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Thomas clarified that the Special Project Fund is actually money set aside for 43 <br />the large projects the City is doing, it is not the Capital Improvement Fund. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.