Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the previous Finance Director did have this project 1 <br />designated as a line item for approximately $1.6 million in the 2004 Capital Improvement 2 <br />Program and was carried forward to the 2005 Capital Improvement Program. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Thomas asked what kind of trouble would the City get into if they put this out 5 <br />to bid and it comes back as an ouch for the City. She asked if the City would be able to change 6 <br />the materials or would they have to go back for a re-bid. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that they would not be able to change anything within the bid. 9 <br />He explained that if the City wanted to change materials they would have to go out for a new bid. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Marty stated that based on the discussion Staff will have to come back to Council with a 12 <br />more clearly defined plan. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if Staff could ask them to be more specific within the bid when 15 <br />they respond. She stated that it was her understanding that Council had already gone through the 16 <br />process and cut the items that they decided were not necessary to complete the project and that 17 <br />this request is a result of that process. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that it is not Staff’s responsibility to make value judgment calls, 20 <br />that is Council’s responsibility and Council cannot ask Staff to make those decisions. She stated 21 <br />that this is a very big project and the City should have some form of a back up plan in the event 22 <br />that the bids come back higher than what the City can afford. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Director Ericson stated that Staff did spend a lot of time working on the plans and specifications’ 25 <br />pulling out what was not needed or critical to the health, safety and well being of the building. 26 <br />He stated that he believes that they have a plan that addresses these issues without the frills going 27 <br />down from a $3.5 million project to a $1.6 million project. He stated that this is a barebones 28 <br />project that does address all of the issues that should be addressed noting that if the bids do come 29 <br />back at a level that the City cannot support then it would have to be dealt with at that time. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the bidders would see the line item list. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that the only line item included is the bid alternate for the front 34 <br />entryway. 35 <br /> 36 <br />MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Thomas To Approve Resolution 6583, Approving the Final Plans 37 <br />and Specifications and Setting a Bid Date for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project and Amend to 38 <br />Include the Line Item List in the Plans and Specifications and waive the reading. 39 <br />. 40 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 41 <br /> 42 <br />D. Consider Resolution 6584 Revising the 2005 Fee Schedule. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Director Ericson stated that this resolution provides clarification on the amount the City can 45