Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />vehicle from the “Cadillac” version down to a vehicle without all the “bells and whistles.” He 1 <br />stated he can see where Councilmember Thomas is coming from but he has been in contact with 2 <br />the Mayors of Spring Lake Park and Blaine and would support including the command vehicle. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated this is a joint powers agreement and he concurs with 5 <br />Councilmember Thomas. He asked how a command vehicle could be financed if it is not 6 <br />included in the bond referendum and put off for a year. Fire Chief Zikmund stated there are a 7 <br />number of options for that debt. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mr. Thistle advised that it could be financed by equipment certificates for 10 to 20 years. The 10 <br />rates could be the same or different but the credit rating would be the same. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Marty noted the Mounds View bond rating has recently been increased. Mr. Thistle 13 <br />advised that Blaine is a rated a very strong AA3. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated her concern, if it is delayed, is the increase in cost to purchase it 16 <br />next year. Fire Chief Zikmund stated they are seeing 5-11% equipment cost increases, however 17 <br />it is hard to say. He explained one of the things driving that increase is FEMA grant money that 18 <br />has placed more money into the market. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mr. Thistle stated another issue is that putting it off even two weeks would push this bond issue 21 <br />into next year. In order to keep the bonds bank qualified, Blaine delayed all of their other debt to 22 <br />next year. If this bond issue is pushed into next year, it would become non-bank qualified and at 23 <br />a higher interest rate. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated no one is considering delaying this resolution, but the discussion 26 <br />has been about the delay in the command vehicle. She noted there is really no decision to make 27 <br />because it is up to Blaine, they are issuing the bonds, and they cut the command vehicle. She 28 <br />noted that Mounds View discussed the possibility of cutting costs and she will support the Blaine 29 <br />decision. She stated she does not want there to be confusion that Mounds View can now do the 30 <br />command vehicle. 31 <br /> 32 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he spoke with the Blaine City Manager and learned this is a 33 <br />budget issue. He agreed it is best to support Blaine in their decision but the Mounds View 34 <br />Council could have a separate document, perhaps along with Spring Lake Park, asking Blaine to 35 <br />reconsider for next year. That could also be addressed at a joint workshop meeting with the other 36 <br />cities. He agreed with the importance of supporting the City of Blaine in their decision. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Councilmember Gunn stated her agreement. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mayor Marty agreed that is the diplomatic thing to do. He suggested a joint three City meeting 41 <br />be scheduled to discuss this and other issues. 42 <br /> 43 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated staff and administrators discussed scheduling such a meeting 44 <br />and that perhaps two Councilmembers from each City should attend along with staff. 45