Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 14, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty clarified that it is not the City but Velmeir who has not lived up to what they agreed 1 <br />to do. Velmeir is not doing harm against the City but harm against Mr. Perrozzi who will need to 2 <br />take the proper action. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated Velmeir has now sold the property to someone else. Also Michael Fox, who 5 <br />owns the apartments, is in a predicament because he is not in compliance with Code so they want 6 <br />him to sign a quit claim deed. Now the bank is mad because they hold title to a piece of property 7 <br />that is not clear. He suggested that shoddy work was done and they are not standing behind their 8 <br />work. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Councilmember Flaherty agreed that it is not the City’s issue but Velmeir who has made 11 <br />promises. He stated that Mr. Perrozzi has been at Council meetings since he’s been on the 12 <br />Council. Councilmember Flaherty stated he felt that Mr. Perrozzi has been getting stonewalled 13 <br />so it may behoove the City to make a call to Velmeir and ask what is going on. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated if he gets his parking lot in then it will be fine but if not then he will take it 16 <br />into court. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated three months ago Mr. Perrozzi asked the City to call Velmeir and 19 <br />that was done but nothing happened. She suggested staff be directed to make another telephone 20 <br />call and if Velmeir is not responsive, then staff should immediately contact Mr. Perrozzi and let 21 <br />him know. Councilmember Thomas stated she is not sure what more the City can do. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mr. Perrozzi asked how long the City can hold the bond money of $17,000. Director Ericson 24 <br />stated there is a two-year maintenance bond on the project. Mr. Perrozzi stated that $17,000 is 25 <br />not enough to finish the parking lot and questioned how that has “teeth.” 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Marty asked Director Ericson to contact Velmeir and report back to the Council. 28 <br /> 29 <br />6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISNESS 30 <br /> 31 <br />None. 32 <br /> 33 <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 34 <br /> 35 <br />A. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider the First Reading and Introduction of 36 <br />Ordinance 766, an Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a Drainage and 37 <br />Utility Easement Associated with the Belting Development 38 <br /> 39 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that associated with the Belting 40 <br />redevelopment property there is an excess drainage and utility easement. It was configured based 41 <br />on the layout of the building but that layout has changed so the ordinance would vacate the 42 <br />drainage easement and place another in alignment with the back of the building. The RCWD 43 <br />supports it as subscribing to the best management practices. He advised that an ordinance is 44