My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/12/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/12/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:41 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 1:10:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/12/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />requests for development have been submitted. The Council authorized a wetland delineation for 1 <br />the area as to where it is and how it will impact possible or future development. Director Ericson 2 <br />noted that some property owners in that area are interested in developing but nothing has been 3 <br />formally presented. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mr. Meyer asked what is the possible cost to Mounds View for removal of the billboards. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Director Ericson stated the potential exposure to the City if there is no home for an additional 8 <br />billboard sign is $810,000 and the risk is for one sign. If one sign can be located elsewhere in 9 <br />Mounds View, then there is no risk for any additional relocation costs. He advised that Clear 10 <br />Channel is working on that process and has asked the City to not be involved until they have 11 <br />presented options. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Meyer suggested that the best possible location with no cost to the City would be off Arden 14 <br />Park, which has the same exposure across the street and can hold two to three signs without any 15 <br />trouble. However, if development is approved there first, it may be a problem. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Director Ericson explained that land is zoned single family residential and Mn/DOT and the 18 <br />Federal Highway Beautification Act requires billboards to be located in commercial or 19 <br />industrially zoned property. Therefore billboards cannot be located along the majority of 20 <br />Highway 10 on the south side because it is zoned residential and not appropriate for a billboard. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Mr. Meyer suggested rezoning some property. 23 <br /> 24 <br />6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISNESS 25 <br /> 26 <br />None. 27 <br /> 28 <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 29 <br /> 30 <br />A. 7:05 p.m.: Continued Public Hearing to Consider the Second Reading and 31 <br />Adoption of Ordinance 766, An Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a 32 <br />Drainage and Utility Easement Associated with the Belting Office 33 <br />Development 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mayor Marty noted this public hearing was opened at the last meeting and remains open tonight 36 <br />for public input. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained the public hearing remained open for 39 <br />publication and notification purposes since it was not done as soon as it should have been. The 40 <br />public hearing was continued to assure all had an opportunity to provide input. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Director Ericson advised that the request is for second reading of the ordinance to vacate an 43 <br />easement granted when Walgreens was constructed. He explained the storm water drainage 44 <br />easement is located in the corner where Belting is proposing an 8,300 square foot office building. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.