My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/02/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/02/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:33 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:17:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/23/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The remaining $647,540 of the 2004 sewer operating budget is for wages, utilities, <br />supplies, repairs, and depreciation. These costs won’t be changed appreciably by <br />variations in the total flow into the sewer system. So we propose that these costs <br />should be the fixed component of the rate that will be charged to all customers <br />regardless of water usage. <br /> <br />The variable sewer bill would be based on water usage for the months of January, <br />February, and March of each year. This avoids months where residents will be using <br />water in ways (washing cars and watering lawns or gardens) that don’t put water into <br />the sewer system. <br /> <br />For this report, I analyzed all residential customers who pay the $47.00 per quarter flat <br />rate. These include apartments, condominiums, duplexes and town-homes. The <br />January 5, 2004 preliminary report only analyzed single-family homes. <br /> <br />Single-family homes tend to be occupied by a larger number of people than do <br />apartments, condominiums, duplexes and town-homes. As such, they also tend to have <br />higher water consumption. <br /> <br />The single-family homes had a median water consumption of 16.45 units of water in the <br />winter of 2003. When all residential properties are analyzed, they had a median water <br />consumption of 14.82 units of water in the winter of 2003 <br /> <br />The 4,461 residential properties produce $838,668 of sewer revenue per year. Fifty <br />four percent (763,000 divided by $1,410,540) would need to be replaced by the variable <br />portion of the new rate and forty six percent would need to be replaced by the fixed <br />portion. <br /> <br />The fixed rate calculates as: 46% times $838,668 is $385,787. This divided by 4,461 <br />equals $21.58 that would be the fixed charge per household, per quarter. This is the <br />same as in the January 5, 2004 report. <br /> <br />However, the variable portion of the sewer rate is different. Since there is lower median <br />water consumption for all residential properties, the variable sewer rate per unit of water <br />is higher. <br /> <br />The 4,461 residences used 66,106 units of water in January through March 2003. The <br />variable rate calculates as: 54% times $838,668 is $452,881. This divided by 66,106 <br />equals $6.86 per unit of annual revenue, or $1.72 per unit of water based on the winter <br />usage. In the January 5, 2004 report, the variable rate was $1.55 per unit of water <br />based on the winter usage. <br /> <br />The median water consumption was about 14.82 units (1,000 gallons). Anyone who <br />used 15 or more units would see their sewer bill go up. Anyone who used 14 or fewer <br />units would see their sewer bill go down. <br /> <br />There would need to be provisions made for staff to adjust the readings for homes that <br />had estimated bills and then supplied an actual or who had a running toilet and then <br />made a repair.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.