My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/05/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/05/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:54 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:43:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/10/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/10/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 26, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he has not done a cost benefit analysis but does feel there 1 <br />will be some benefit. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Quick asked if it would be better to condemn that one house in the long run and 4 <br />put in a pond. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he has not discussed this with the DNR but there may be a 7 <br />grant available to help with the installation costs. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if there is an opportunity to have Spring Lake Park share in the 10 <br />costs. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the bulk of the drainage is coming from Mounds View. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Linke asked that these comments be brought up at the public hearing for the benefit of 15 <br />residents. 16 <br /> 17 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Linke. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6232, a 18 <br />Resolution Setting an Assessment Hearing Date of May 24, 2004, Authorizing the Advertisement 19 <br />for the Hearing, Declaring Cost to be Assessed, and Ordering the Preparation of Proposed 20 <br />Assessment for the 2003 Street Improvement Project. 21 <br /> 22 <br /> F. Resolution 6231 Step Increase for David Parker 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Linke read Resolution 6231. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Council Member Stigney asked that the Resolution be revised to reflect that there is only one 27 <br />employee and to correct the hiring dates. 28 <br /> 29 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Postpone to the Next Council Meeting. 30 <br /> 31 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 32 <br /> 33 <br />G. Resolution 6230 Amending the 2003 Budgets for the General Fund and 34 <br />Police Special Revenue Funds. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Marty asked what the police forfeiture special revenue fund is for. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated the police grants’ special revenue fund is used to account for 39 <br />state and federal grants including the juvenile accountability incentive block grant. He then said 40 <br />that some officers time was incorrectly coded to the general fund rather than the grant fund. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that each year when there is a grant fund and forfeiture the 43 <br />City puts in a nominal amount of spending that the City expects to have and then Staff comes to 44 <br />Council for specific purchases or grants. In this case, there were items that ended up exceeding 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.