11-03-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 4 i the proposed landscape chanes sidewalk location, and all of the other changes that have • indicate p p p changes, been addressed, to provide the City Council will have a final, revised set of plans for consideration. Chair Peterson noted the site plan indicates the parking stalls to be 9 feet by 18 feet in size, and the City Code requires 9 feet by 20 feet. Planning Associate Ericson explained that Ordinance 620 has revised the dimensional requirements of the parking stalls, and the proposed statue within the Code. _:��. � �: lk Air o': Chair Peterson pointed out a discrepancy in the revised elev.:tions, which'range tween 112 to 113 feet, and the previous elevations, which were indicated to age between' h ?*1 sto _000 feet. :;Mr. Lewis explained this was an error on the part of the architect, and t correct4ei ; t ns arc the 912 to 914-foot range. Assisar >' fF° t<'wr4 Chair Peterson inquired regarding the elevation of the lot, ane 'il 'wuld be brought in or removed some concrete .lock on the site that will be removed, g there would be no need for fill to be brought in or removed<>" the site. FAth inout that the ma'orit 't 'ith`e'> t n a IOW•kto be directed toward the Commissioner Kaden pointed J ,,,,;_;�a.,.:,_.3.:��.,� �,::.,>..: g PP : SuperAmerica site. Mr. Lewis explained that the floodlights= _<the:parking lot would be directed downward. H,< °<. <.. Rit{: Yr�_...a Y.'jam"�:ir_.. ..�.. Planning Associate Ericson advised tha tere is spine light spillage onto the SuperAmerica location, and the Code does not require therep-4.ny min zation of:Zi ht spillage onto a. commercial property. €'" `''t e candle of the lighting, and it appears that He indicated, however, there is a r �i�rementan' �rans c� = `'�"� pp the MSP light)* decreases .c a .;r minimal` mo t within a. short distance from the site. He added that the for t-candle reading a:.<.;;::.<tthe street> r ell within the Code requirements. Chair Peterson:`oti .;entrance''a 4 alk at the eastern side of the building, with pedestal type lighting at this location. e inquiredli bl' would provide Sufficient lighting for the entrance. Mr. Le ::hex lained this :<. •rimaril for deliverypurposes. He pointed out that the eastern , portio f the facility will ' ed for the Alzheimer s clientele, who will have a separate access, andaiiS entrance will be With d at night. Ay ewis inquired if a" "ve-foot wide sidewalk would be sufficient, rather than 7 feet, as indicated .$t0 PlanningAssociate Ericson explained the Department of Public Works requires a seven-foot _.:. provideplows�,� .a.. ..f maintenance vehicles, to that the- and brushes don't interfere with t andsca e. Council Liaison Stigney inquired if the remaining debris at the MSP site located across from the assisted living facility would be removed. Mr. Lewis explained he was not the project manager for this site, however, he would bring the matter to the attention of the president of the company. 110