My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-03-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-03-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 2:48:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:48:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/3/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> • Commissioner Stevenson pointed out that unless the center median at the entrance on County Road <br /> I is removed or shortened,which is not presently allowed, there would be no alternative but a right-in, <br /> right-out turn at this location, therefore, signage may not be necessary. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson pointed out that although it is not intended that traffic traveling west on <br /> County Road I utilize the County Road I access, some people may deviate from this by crossing a <br /> lane of traffic and diverting themselves from the median. In addition, he plain dthat eastbound <br /> antlioartraffic on County Road I travels at a fairly significant speed4102:d althoughBring the site at this <br /> location from the westbound lane is probably less of an issue,'it'would`'likely less hazardous <br /> eliminate this ingress altogether, m rk' i „c"into e si n <br /> g marking it exit only anctivert all tralc intra,<f �::;sze to Mounds <br /> View Drive. He commented however, this might be overly cautious:>r� <br /> F=<� ter: `�*.., ..., ;�a' <br /> tESaW <br /> Chair ete son stated that a motorist traveling east on esOnlyiRpad I might see the Traffic light <br /> change and increase their speed to reach the light at the same same;t40044.0hisle is attempting to drive the <br /> wrong direction to by-pass the median and access the driveway."`' a` be believed signage at this <br /> location was a very prudent consideration and not overly cautious,, <br /> sagym ;.:. imp <br /> Commissioner Laube inquired if the site access at urgogpiNfioy,Drive would be indicated "entrance <br /> only," as previously discussed. He pointed, is hat thisexits,t e site in an area surrounded <br /> by a strip mall, the SuperAmerica station,,d nd the Silver Lake< ` ds Development. <br /> Ar Viler <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated thi :::`'ould not;e ossible °s it would restrict• �� tau �,�y p �� d est ict vehicles attempting <br /> to travel west on County Road I, who„ would subsequently have to enter the SuperAmerica or Burger <br /> King sites, and turn around. itior" <br /> Commissionerbe oit ted: } at the traffic trattn:Siltm the SuperAmerica station will be adjacent to <br /> the site, an l°':across t t within a few feet, there is a 131-unit development, with only <br /> this and one at .:owhichW ll l n much congestion at this location. <br /> >:�:} �,t�:,�. of <br /> Valtr <br /> Commissioner= idip emsimuch t ed 80 percent of the traffic exiting the site to go to the highway would <br /> exit onto ty Road'>>=tttht:and travel east to the traffic light. He explained that there would <br /> not •e. < 'any peop e trave >on ounty Roas I, owever, they should be allowed to do so, as <br /> forcarr them to first travele'i ton County Road I would ultimately create more congestion. <br /> i'Vewis stated he a•reed with this. He added that if Mounds View Drive was restricted to an <br /> entrance only, people>'��ould disobey this, or problems would result on County Road I. He pointed<. n�facilities do notgenerate a large amount of traffic, and there would onlybe <br /> g <br /> eoyees on site during the heaviest shift, who would not be entering or exiting the site <br /> duriri -peak traffic times. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired if the fire hydrant location had been addressed by the Fire Marshall. <br /> • Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has not yet consulted with the Fire Marshall, however, this <br /> matter will be addressed prior to the next meeting of the Planning Commission. He explained that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.