My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-03-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-03-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 2:48:18 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 2:48:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/3/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> He stated that PlanSight, the consultant who is developing the maps, has provided the first draft, to • <br /> which he has made some editorial changes, and they should be available by the end of the week. He <br /> noted this is a discussion draft of the Comprehensive Plan, with information pending, in terms of <br /> transportation issues and traffic projections from Ramsey County and MNDot. He indicated he was <br /> also attempting to obtain additional language from the City Attorney regarding airport issues for <br /> inclusion in the document, however, with those exceptions, the draft should b 'ompleted for <br /> discussion on October 27. He suggested the Commission's first consideration at,tltaf meeting should <br /> somfi <br /> be the method with which they will approach the review process. 405600*,, <br /> >' <br /> alp *VVARde* <br /> Chair Peterson inquired if there were any major changes griire draft sigig th .e.., io :s review <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated there wereq_ ,aj r changes. He'"6044000t at he <br /> has reorganized some of the information, and included algtiltae,ain the Land Use'sectiion, which <br /> indicates the compatibility between the Zoning Districts andt#0104MDesignations. He stated there <br /> was additional information regarding highway noise andOterttai :walls along Highway 118, <br /> based upon complaints staff has received in terms of noise levels ue ;e<>increased traffic along <br /> this road. 4< <h ' <br /> Chair Peterson stated since the early 1990'xAfind discussion dis910000p,:%g freeway, the issue of noise <br /> walls has come forward many times, and thetandard t nswe o A''. of has been that only areas <br /> of new construction or major modificatio °are eligiblefor a sa >wall. He explained, therefore, the <br /> portion of the new Highway 10, east,dkang L e Road, is_, lit eligible for a sound wall, and this is <br /> likely the area that generates the majority of complaints. . <br /> Setn. AN" <br /> Communityevelo ment Dir o Jopke statedthi i s'correct. He advised, however, MNDot has <br /> indicated heywi 1 be moraionng noise levels along>this roadway in the spring and summer, as traffic <br /> levels st ., t depen utile i heir determination, are agreeable to indicate this section of <br /> roadway as ju f q a soundwyin the future. <br /> Nowtor <br /> Sly . <br /> Chair Petersonto�� r d never felt he treatment of this matter was fair, in that there are some <br /> definite increased impasi tresidents in this area, and no means of recourse. <br /> Co nity DevelopmentDirector Jopke stated he felt it was important that the City indicate on <br /> re that this problem should be addressed, and this is why it has been noted in the Comprehensive <br /> P kti <br /> L{+bY <br /> CoMag <br /> . :. :e `Stenson inquired regarding the types of maps that will be provided with the draft <br /> p' :, stay Development Director Jopke explained these would be colored maps, 8'/2 by 11 <br /> inch n e. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson inquired if this was such a reduced size, the maps would be difficult to read. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated in his opinion, the maps appeared to be very good, <br /> however, staff would look into this. • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.