11-17-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 10 in desired a single-family use in the R-2 district. Commissioner Hegland pointed out that the zoning • could be changed, and probably should be to prevent these situations. Planning Associate Ericson stated that side by side twin homes in zero lot line subdivisions can be addressed in the R-2 Zoning District separately from this consideration. Commissio i er Stevenson commented he would like to see them considered separately, as it would be confusi a • group R-2, R-3 and R-4 together, and not include a specific reference to adjoined dr:iv'_:::e.._..:.-.--.wa ;s., Chair Peterson advised if there are zoning incompatibilities 'ould'''`: ::' r'-; however, un that time,these situations should still be addressed. He reit- 'ed there .e;I z. .; that reg„ consideration, and although this may be a temporary situ.h7n, it is sub,e to t e;.: :' •,%9.on regarding whether or not to down zone these properties' . " Planning Associate Ericson advised this could be done i4 hj ," ion with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, as a logical next step to make t o ` gW .:: ;'' tent to the land use. He indicated staff would make changes to the proposed grainance,':YOK.`7:01 it forward at the next meeting of the Planning Commission. , : es` ' f,.. k.. : 7. Staff Reports/Items of Inform. 1 n �, , :4> ,, ,. A. Billboard Update Ill Community Development Direct.Repke sta ��never. .k nths prior, staff drafted an ordinance for considerati. :which woul a : . ',', for bill..' - $ ..nditional use permit in certain areas of the communit,. o "ig as t " $$r4 :4 . rtain st. ' e indicated the discussion of this matter was delayed ' ''e'' ,si"-•t Att. '- s. ed •issues concerning spot zoning, and whether or not there were anyd <:._... ; % s whic > _. 0 bit billboards on the golf course property. He explained the City Atto >•n opi :ff tes these issues might not be a problem under certain circumstanc- ',zt. `` Co eli Developme " opk.e stated at this point, it is appropriate to further discuss the ori_.i: ordinance, and ' Planning Commission to provide a recommendation to the City Cs it in this regard. >Fi,,j11E unity Develo1411=nt Director Jopke stated the City Attorney has reviewed the ordinance and . °``% a ' a he conditional use permit process outlined in the proposed ordinance appears s. t ' A . < : owever, the conditional use permits could not be limited to City owned property. He `'rt -r. sinmented that due to the zoning of specific properties at the golf course, even if the City grants a conditional use permit, the State may not grant a permit, which would be necessary for this to occur. Community Development Director Jopke pointed out that if the City desires to proceed with • billboards, one alternative would be to indicate the conditional use permit would be granted in the