Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> • CRP of PF Districts along a State or Federal highways. He explained this language appears to <br /> address the issue, more by district than by property ownership. He added that the City Attorney has <br /> not reviewed this language, at this point. <br /> Community Development Director requested the Commissioners discuss the specific •mssdinance, and <br /> , <br /> determine if they are comfortable with the provisions therein. He explained the Co �ff ssion should <br /> also consider whether or not there should be a public hearing process i .:e re a, and what that <br /> process should be. He noted there was previous discussion th. here s 8Vspecific ordinance <br /> for presentation to the public, and when the ordinance is sui.�.� sr p611a:> the Commissi• s. <br /> should direct staff regarding the public process and how otice it. 4:.. <br /> Commissioner Kaden inquired if the ordinance required r- ... in:„,-reflect that t ,- . . al use <br /> permit would not be limited to City owned properties. `` ' <br /> �a <br /> Community Development Director Jopke advised this C'.:. • • • through specific districts, <br /> such as the PF or CRP districts, however, there are •me P `:::`:•':' t 'dst the single family <br /> residential, and this would not be an appropriate loca •; billboare • 'sed that the City has <br /> control over these properties, however, it would 4. • • o•Hate toy:k'-`i t ger limit the conditional <br /> use permits to State or Federal highways bec. es- •.•,, mor-s<ppropriate locations for the <br /> billboards. <br /> II) . Commissioner Kaden inquired if thi,;.::!",,,„•'2,, Id op- p High 35W to additional billboards. <br /> Community Development Direct t ' •pke pr d th- a mmission with a map indicating the CRP <br /> and PF zone:$r operties wit'' ity. He - is a portion of land at the golf course, and <br /> a strip of d on t ;:.• .•a of Hi8, north of the Mobile Home Park. He added <br /> that ther-.. • t• 'unty 1 .w a Creek on County 10 and Highway 35W that would be the <br /> other possi, 46. <br /> i <br /> Chair Peterson;'. • - a ing ne . Ain the outcome of the case in the city of St. Paul regarding <br /> billboard <br /> Co nity Developmen or Jopke stated this was a referendum vote to ban billboards in the <br /> cit 'f St. Paul, which s defeated during the election. He advised there would be no ban on <br /> b." "• ards in St. Pau e pointed out that the community should decide whether they desire <br /> He ex•. ed the Commission can recommend to the Council that billboards are <br /> 4'4E96:,,', - . • :vide a recommendation on the specific ordinance that staff has drafted, and <br /> fig' e City Council. p <br /> Commissioner Hegland inquired if the funds generated from billboards placed upon golf course <br /> property would be directed to the golf course. Community Development Director Jopke stated this <br /> was correct. He explained that any revenues received from billboards on that property would be used <br /> to retire the debt at the golf course. He stated that a billboard on property other than the golf course <br /> iwould not be subject to that same provision. <br />