11-17-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 12 Commissioner Hegland commented the billboard consideration was originally undertaken as an • attempt to retire the debt at the golf course more quickly. Community Development Director Jopke stated this was presented as an alternative to produce revenue to assist with paying off the existing debt at the golf course. Commissioner Hegland inquired how much revenue the billboards were e timated.t.<:. enerate, and what would be the effect on the debt at the golf course, and the City, ,• .ul. y proceed with billboards other properties. Community Development Director Jopke stated the estim.§ revenue .<� ti.$ . would r.., :�- Win. .. .iq._ y.< Yui �� between $1,000 to $2,000 per sign, per month, $12,001 o $24,0 . .er ye. .# -• . y as uncertain regarding the impact this would have on howl the•t at the gol ' a i Id be paid. Commissioner Hegland commented this was the originalp- ;>` >: uing billboards, however, Wit does not represent anything significant in terms of retiring tha 7,�_ Swas uncertain why they were proceeding with the matter. Community Development Director Jopkeed o'> °••e is s of revenue and debt are considerations of the Council, and they ultimat , _€:' ision regarding the economic issues. He explained that the Planning .mmissi.)`shoul. t .. :: > tpon the land use issues and the impact on the community, as this is .,g 'prop in input t. ;rovide to the CityCouncil. • P per ' p Chair Peterson commented there . ••: ed to • ,�.me • : Yton in terms of the Highway Department policies and, >'a zoning. H >' 's , ed that= :.4' ' • • p. given to the City with the provision that it - y howe z- - hwa De artm.ent regulations require that must be .151Tia,, a pu• �' �� '�$ -:, �..�s` g Y P � q _.e alto ' + ercialproperty. p billboar .\. • He stated this resented a conflict. :... .. Vii:.. Community D=". • Direc . i W stated this might be the case. He reiterated the City Attorney's in .,� <<, .t: ever it proceeds in this matter, the State must ultimately issue the permi tri• they lqi wed upon the fact that this property is not zoned for commercial or t . ��a. -, Ike notezl hatthe-State-may-consider-t-his-more-of-amrn e� er-c•a � l-usend there ;: e, be willing to is ``'permit, however, this is simply speculation, and will not be known u 4ir billboard owner a g •lies for a permit. '-0 ssioner Stev -.n inquired if staff had conducted research of the ordinances relating to .. ::..:>'• t sunding communities. Co I evelopment Director Jopke stated the cities of Arden Hills, New Brighton, and Shoreview do not allow billboards. The research indicates that Shoreview and Arden Hills prohibit any new billboards, and existing billboards are grandfathered in. He pointed out that Shoreview is attempting to remove billboards through redevelopment, as it comes forward. •