Laserfiche WebLink
Sunrise CUP <br /> December 1, 1999 <br /> Page 2 • <br /> CUP Discussion: <br /> The specific CUP requirements, which appear in Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code, relate to the <br /> appropriate front and side yard setbacks, minimum lot size, screening and parking requirements. <br /> As stated and discussed at the Planning Commission on November 17, 1999, all of the specific <br /> requirements for the Church facility are met. <br /> As is the case with every conditional use permit application, the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council are to consider a set of general requirements and address the adverse effects of the <br /> proposal, if any. In this case, all of the general requirements, which appear in Section 1125.01, <br /> Subd. 3b, are sufficiently addressed and satisfied. The Church, which has existed in this location <br /> since 1957, provides a desired service to the residents of Mounds View and the surrounding <br /> communities. To staff's knowledge, there are no problems or issues directly relating to the <br /> operation of Sunrise Church. The use does not present any known adverse impacts to any <br /> adjoining properties or to the community in general. <br /> Given these conclusions, staff believes the granting of a conditional use permit for the Sunrise <br /> United Methodist Church would be appropriate. <br /> Development Review Discussion: • <br /> Dimensional Requirements: <br /> Required Proposed Met? <br /> Lot Area 1 acre 6.4 acres Met <br /> Front Setback(Long Lake) 35 feet 75 feet Met <br /> Front Setback(County Rd. I) 35 feet 47 feet Met <br /> Sideyard Setbacks 30 feet 105 feet Met <br /> Parking lot Setback(east) 30 feet 60 feet Met <br /> Parking lot Setback(west) 5 feet 2 feet (existing) No <br /> Parking lot Setback-(north) 5-feet 80 feet Met <br /> Parking lot Setback(south) 5 feet 400+feet Met <br /> Parking stalls (1:4): 92 stalls 98 stalls Met <br /> As can be seen, other than the exception of the non-conforming parking lot setback, all of the <br /> dimensional requirements for this facility are satisfied. In terms of the parking lot setback, because <br /> (1) this is a pre-existing condition, (2)because the parking lot will not be altered in any way, and <br /> (3)because the extent of the non-conformity will not be changing, staff recommends that the non- <br /> conforming setback be allowed to continue until such time that the parking lot is reconstructed or <br /> repaved. A.stipulation indicating as much is present in the resolution recommending approval. <br /> • <br />