Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 1 <br /> 2 <br />C. 2003 Street Improvement Project Resolution 6268 Construction Contract 3 <br />Award. 4 <br /> 5 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Quick. To Postpone Consideration of Resolution 6268 and 6 <br />Resolution 6261 to June 14, 2004. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if Staff anticipates having the issues resolved by June 14, 2004. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Mayor Linke indicated that Staff feels that the issues could be resolved by then. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Council Member Marty asked if this would delay the project. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that a delay to June 14, 2004 would not affect the schedule. 15 <br /> 16 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 17 <br /> 18 <br />D. Resolution 6261 Providing for the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $2,045,000 19 <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Handled with the previous matter. 22 <br /> 23 <br />E. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 737 to Amend Chapter 603, 24 <br />Garbage and Rubbish, Section 603.06, Subd. 2, Requirements and 25 <br />Restrictions. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Linke indicated that there has been a recommendation to add Thursday to make it two 28 <br />days rather than one. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the reason for the two days is to accommodate the 31 <br />smaller haulers because switching days would cause them great hardship. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Quick said he thinks the City should stick with one day and he agrees with 34 <br />Thursday. He then said that he would be open to granting a one-year time frame to come into 35 <br />compliance. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that he does not see an issue with allowing haulers on two 38 <br />days. He then said that he would like to accommodate the haulers and, if they have an issue with 39 <br />one of the days, allowing the second day would resolve the issue. He further commented that the 40 <br />City does not even know yet if this is a desirable thing to do. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Marty indicated that he would like to stay with one day for haulers in an 43 <br />attempt to accommodate those that sleep during the day because the noise of the trucks would be 44 <br />disruptive only on one day. 45