My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2004/06/28 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Agenda Packets - 2004/06/28 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:42 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 4:34:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/28/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Read Variance and CUP <br />June 28, 2004 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />d. Granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant any special privilege that <br />is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. <br /> <br />Granting the variance would confer upon the property owner a special privilege that <br />is denied to other property owners in the same district. <br /> <br />e. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br />Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. <br /> <br />The applicant indicates that thirteen feet is the minimum to alleviate his hardship. <br /> <br />f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br />property in the same zone. <br /> <br /> <br />A 48-foot wide garage would not necessarily be detrimental to the purpose and intent <br />of the Zoning Code, in the sense that it would not have a negative impact on the <br />surrounding area, however, from an aesthetic standpoint, it would not reflect the <br />principles of the Code. <br /> <br />g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br />property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger <br />of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within <br />the neighborhood. <br /> <br />The proposed garage addition should not have any impact on the supply of light or air <br />to adjacent properties, nor should it impact congestion of streets. The proposed <br />addition will not increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety or decrease <br />property values in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Summary All of the criteria, as indicated above, need to be satisfied to justify granting the <br />variance. The City Council needs to review the criteria and determine whether the variance <br />should be supported. <br /> <br />CUP Considerations: <br /> <br />Code Consistency <br /> <br />Subdivision 6 of Section 1106.04 lists the conditions under which a conditional use permit <br />can be issued. These are as follows: <br /> <br />a. The accessory building must conform with Section 1103.06 and subdivision 1106.03(l) <br />of this Title. <br /> b. The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one (1) lot cannot exceed <br />one thousand eight hundred (1,800) square feet.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.