Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />• Page 7, line 279, Brian Amundsen’s statement, reads: ‘gives a tax business’; should read: <br />‘give a business a tax break’ <br />• Page 9, line 368, reads: ‘the EDA to negotiation this project’; should read: ‘the EDA to <br />negotiate this project’. <br />• Page 10, line 406, reads: ‘adding that the do not believe’; should read: ‘adding that they do <br />not believe’. <br />• Page 12, line 506, asked Commissioner Flaherty to clarify the $778,000 per year. <br /> Commissioner Flaherty explained that he had factored in the $5 million of surplus the <br />City received and spread that out over the 25-years for the district. <br />• Page 14, line 590, reads: ‘approximately $3 million’; should read: ‘approximately $300 <br />million’. <br />• Page 15, line 602, reads: ‘noting that they would have the resources’; should read:’ noting <br />that they would not have the resources’. <br />• Page 15, line 604, reads: ‘over the last number years’; should read: ‘over the last number of <br />years’. <br />• Page 16, line 649, reads: ‘He stated that this is not a fair’; should read: ‘She stated that this is <br />not a fair’. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty Approve the Minutes of June 27, 2005 as amended. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />6. CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />A. Moved to EDA Business Item 7C for discussion. Set a Public Hearing for August <br />8, 2005 for Discussion of the Proposed Business Subsidy for the SYSCO <br />Minnesota Expansion Project. <br /> <br />7. EDA BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Review and Consider Possible Acquisition of 2617 Sherwood Road, a <br />Property identified as a Blighted and Hazardous Building. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that 2617 Sherwood Road is vacant and <br />currently uninhabitable. He noted that last year on October 11th the City Council adopted a <br />resolution ordering the abatement of the property and since that point the City has been working <br />with the property owners in trying to correct the deficiencies. He stated that so far they have <br />been unsuccessful in getting anything accomplished. He stated that they have set multiple court <br />dates, there have been continuances adding that Kennedy and Graven have been working on this <br />on the City’s behalf noting that they have come to a possible agreement that they City could look <br />at this as a potential housing replacement program parcel. He stated that it is on the City’s list <br />and does meet all the requirements for blighted parcel for redevelopment. He stated that Staff