My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
07-25-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:09 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:43:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/25/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
7/25/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />has put together a resolution asking for the Commission’s approval to get an appraisal done on <br />the property and negotiate a price and bring it back for the EDA’s consideration. He stated that <br />they did seek quotes for an appraisal and it could be done for approximately $400.00 <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas asked what the difficulty is with the homeowners, is it a difficulty in <br />contacting them or are they not willing to do the repairs. <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained that it is a combination of things noting that they are dealing with a <br />mortgage company and an individual who acquired the property as a potential investment <br />property not realizing there were so many issues with the property. He stated that originally the <br />City was dealing with a pair of property owners that are no longer in the picture and are now <br />dealing with a bank that has never visited or seen the property. He stated that it is difficult trying <br />to convince them that they now need to spend $25,000 to make repairs to a property that they <br />already have $175,000 invested into it. He stated that someone is making the determination that <br />it isn’t prudent to put any more money into the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked if the property has been forfeited to the mortgage company. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that there is a property owner noting that he is not sure if there was a sale <br />of the property noting that over the last year the City has been dealing with four different groups <br />in effort to correct the deficiencies. He stated that the current property holder is Deutsch Bank. <br /> <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked if the City is anticipating forfeiture. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that at this point the City is not anticipating forfeiture. He explained that <br />they are not dealing with a resident they are dealing with an investment corporation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked if the City knows the loan value of the existing mortgage. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that the City has been told that it is approximately $179,000. He stated <br />that the City would seek an appraisal and offer fair market value for the property, which might <br />not be in that price range. <br /> <br />President Marty noted that in the Staff report the owner has agreed to a potential purchase by the <br />City and suggested moving forward with the appraisal. <br /> <br />Vice President Stigney clarified that if the bank now owns the property then they are responsible <br />for the condition it is in and asked if the City has leverage to have them repair the property versus <br />the City. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that Staff is looking at this option and explained that it is time <br />consuming. He noted that legal fees have been expended due to several continuances, delays and
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.