My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:18 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
8/22/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />almost $1 million higher than that and does not include almost $17 million in interest being paid <br />to Medtronic. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman explained that this is a budget and the amount they get will be limited by the contract. <br />That limit is $14.8 million. He explained that this is an estimate and the EDA can ago lower but <br />cannot go higher so it is generally estimated on the higher side. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs concurred that there is a cap of $14.8 million. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated the EDA is legally obligated to $14.8 million and the interest would be on top <br />of that. <br /> <br />President Marty noted there will be almost $17 million of interest on top of the $14.8 million <br />amount. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Bachman noted that administrative costs show 10% but the <br />cap is at 5% so that would be a difference of about $1 million less in expenditures. He restated <br />this is a budget estimate and if there are additional increments because of larger valuations, this <br />could get paid off early and back on the tax rolls in 19.5 years. In that case, less interest would <br />be paid. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated they tend to recommend to give the broadest range of possibilities. That is why <br />Staff recommended the parcel be included and why the budget is somewhat higher. He noted <br />that interest would have to be paid in any case no matter how it is financed, even if bonds are <br />issued. The interest is to finance the cost of the improvements. <br /> <br />President Marty noted the administrative costs would be about $1 million less so the full <br />$2,100,000 would go to Blaine for the land acquisition. Mr. Inman stated that would be correct if <br />it got that far down in the “pecking order.” <br /> <br />President Marry read the Interfund Loan Requirement indicating: “If the City wants to pay for <br />administrative or other expenditures from a tax increment fund, it is recommended that a <br />resolution authorizing a loan from another fund be passed prior to the issuance of the check.” He <br />asked if there are any plans for interfund loans. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated it is on the budget page. <br /> <br />President Marty asked where those funds would come from. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated they are defined to give flexibility and if the EDA decided to do that, Staff will <br />bring back recommendations and resolutions for approval that identifies where the funds would
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.