My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
08-22-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:18 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 8:45:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
8/22/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />come from. He explained this section merely memorializes the fact that the EDA may do that. <br />However, this is a method of finance and would need to be approved by the EDA by resolution. <br /> <br />President Marty noted if the State compresses business taxes, as they have in the past, and the <br />EDA gets into a bind, the EDA could transfer from the TIF pool in order to meet obligations. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated that would not be the case for this situation because the contract limits the <br />developer to whatever taxes they generate. If there is tax compression, they just get whatever <br />they pay. The EDA would not be required or obligated to find funds to pay them. <br /> <br />President Marty stated he understands this being included as a “safe gap” but he does not <br />understand why interfund loans and transfers are included as $5 million. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman explained that none can take place unless approved in the future and it is only <br />included as an option. <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained that the Highway 10 plan is adopted and if financing comes up short <br />and there are excess dollars in TIF District No. 5, then the City could authorize a loan to borrow <br />from that District. This resolution would allow that ability but it does not mean the City would <br />have to approve an interfund loan. It would have to be approved by a resolution adoption. <br /> <br />President Marty stated his understanding this TIF District is a pay-as-you -go so it will not be <br />creating a pool. <br /> <br />Mr. Inman stated it does not create a pool but experience is that it will be paid off early so in a <br />certain period of time, the EDA will have to decide whether to shut down the district and put it <br />back on tax rolls. Or, it could be used for a different project such as a highway project <br />mentioned by Director Ericson. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas stated it is the same as TIF District No. 3; the EDA can determine if it <br />wants to end it early or use the funds for other projects. <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Bachman stated another option is that utilities could be paid <br />from administration. <br /> <br />President Marty referred to the last paragraph of Page 2-2, Subsection 2-5 indicating: “The EDA <br />or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights-of- <br />way…The EDA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct <br />purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan.” He stated he <br />personally does not like condemnation and including it makes him uncomfortable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.