My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-2016
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
EDA
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
05-29-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 10:19:26 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 10:19:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDA
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
Date
5/29/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA May 29, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />7. EDA BUSINESS <br /> <br />A. Resolution 12-EDA-270, Authorizing the Purchase of Banners & Bracket <br />Sets for the Light Poles Located along the County Road 10 Trailways. <br /> <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated back in April at a Council work session, the <br />Council discussed various beautification items for the County Road 10 corridor. The Council <br />wished to explore purchasing banners and brackets for the light poles along County Road 10 <br />trailways. She reviewed several quotes with the Council stating the bids were extremely <br />competitive. She requested the EDA review the proposals and discuss how to proceed with this <br />item. Staff indicated the EDC was in favor of installing decorative banners as well. At this time, <br />given the expense of the banners and brackets, Staff was recommending the EDA not proceed <br />with the purchase. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull questioned why Staff was not recommending the purchase. Economic <br />Development Specialist Steinmetz commented there were other beautification items that could <br />be completed with the $6,500, as the banners may not be the highest and best use of the EDA’s <br />funds. She stated this item was lower on the EDC’s list noting property acquisition and <br />demolition was higher on their list along with additional mowing and painting of the <br />semaphores. <br /> <br />President Flaherty agreed that only half of the light poles should have banners and asked if the <br />light poles were evenly spaced on both sides of the highway. Executive Director Ericson was <br />uncertain and indicated the intent was not to align the banners evenly on both sides of the <br />roadway. <br /> <br />President Flaherty questioned what type of material the banners would be made from. Economic <br />Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated the banners would be made from a Weatherguard <br />material and were highly weather resistant. She commented the banners would be double sided. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mueller inquired if the banner design could be altered. Economic Development <br />Specialist Steinmetz stated this was up for discussion by the EDA. Executive Director Ericson <br />stated Staff did have a recommended design. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mueller asked how long it would take for the City to receive the brackets if the <br />EDA were to proceed. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz explained it would take at <br />least a month or longer depending on the vendor chosen. <br /> <br />President Flaherty was in favor of proceeding with the banner and bracket purchase as the EDA <br />had funds available for the expense, in addition to funds from Bethlehem Baptist. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mueller was in favor of Option 2, with the funding recommended under Option 1. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Stigney questioned the size of the New Brighton banners. Economic Development
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.