My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2013
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-14-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:07:38 AM
Creation date
8/3/2018 10:34:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/14/2013
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
10/14/2013
EDA Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA October 14, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />President Flaherty inquired how the expense would be funded. Executive Director Ericson <br />commented the EDA had funds available in TIF dollars to cover the consulting expense. He <br />reported an allocation could be completed at a subsequent meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mueller thanked staff for the thorough report on this item. She further discussed <br />the Bolton & Menk RFQ stating she was pleased with the time table included in the proposal. <br />She expressed concern with the value differences between the proposals given the large range in <br />prices. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull asked if Bolton & Menk completed the 2006 study. Economic Development <br />Specialist Steinmetz stated the 2006 study was completed by Stantec, formerly Bonestroo. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull preferred the Bolton & Menk RFQ. <br /> <br />Commissioner Meehlhause asked that staff summarize the recommendation again for the <br />Commission. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated she and Executive Director <br />Ericson evaluated the four proposals and found that HKgi best met the objectives set forth within <br />the RFQ. In addition, she supported the HKgi proposal due to the fact this company was a <br />planning firm, and not an engineering firm. She indicated her second choice was Stantec and her <br />third choice would be Bolton & Menk. <br /> <br />Executive Director Ericson added that the other firms could provide a quality product for the City <br />of Mounds View. However, HKgi had a great deal of experience providing planning services. <br /> <br />President Flaherty thanked staff for the additional comments. He indicated the EDA may need <br />additional information in order to reach a consensus on this matter. He recommended this item <br />be postponed to a future meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hull questioned if the City had a tight deadline for this project. Executive <br />Director Ericson explained the City could wait two weeks for this decision. <br /> <br />President Flaherty requested this item be brought back to the EDA for further discussion on <br />October 28, 2013. <br /> <br />8. REPORTS <br /> <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz explained October 20-26, 2013 was Minnesota <br />Manufacturer’s Week in Mounds View. <br /> <br />9. NEXT EDA MEETING: Monday, October 28, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.