My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-24-2014
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
03-24-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:04 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 6:26:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/24/2014
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
3/24/2014
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA February 24, 2014 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />Executive Director Ericson requested the EDA review several draft site plans for the Crossroad 1 <br />Pointe redevelopment project. He explained that Stantec has compiled the information collected 2 <br />from the recent Open House and had a presentation for the Authority. He indicated staff was 3 <br />seeking direction from the EDA. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Stuart Krahn, Stantec, provided comment on the concept site plans that were presented to the 6 <br />public at the recent Open House. The five goals for the mixed use project were discussed. He 7 <br />explained that after reviewing the information gathered at the Open House, the vision for the 8 <br />project had been refined. He reported there was no overall consensus on the development 9 <br />direction for the site. However, there was concern about development on this site and how it 10 <br />would relate to other developments along the corridor. In addition, there was a desire for locally-11 <br />oriented, mixed-use development with connections and adequate green space. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mr. Krahn further reviewed the comments and concerns voiced by the public based on the three 14 <br />proposed site plans. He explained the mixed-use site plan received the most positive votes at the 15 <br />Open House. He indicated this plan has been revised to more closely meet the needs of the City. 16 <br /> The revised mixed use concept was described in detail to the EDA. The primary traffic flows 17 <br />through this site were discussed. He provided comment on the proposed amenities and green 18 <br />infrastructure for the project. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Commissioner Mueller expressed concern with the attached residential. She understood this was 21 <br />a flexible placeholder and could be further refined. She requested further information on the turf 22 <br />pavers. Mr. Krahn provided the EDA with further information on the open-celled turf paver 23 <br />concept. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Commissioner Mueller questioned if the proposed office/medical building would be two or three 26 <br />stories high. Mr. Krahn explained he was proposing a single story building. If a multiple story 27 <br />building were pursued, additional parking or structured parking would be needed. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Commissioner Meehlhause had concern with the proposed townhomes on the site and thanked 30 <br />staff for clarifying that these were a placeholder. He discussed the traffic concerns at County 31 <br />Road H and County Road 10. He recommended a restaurant be considered within this project. 32 <br /> 33 <br />President Flaherty commented he did not want to see any housing on this space. He understood 34 <br />that parking would be a concern for this 4 acre parcel. He suggested the entire site be filled with 35 <br />commercial/retail or restaurant space. He also envisioned the site being a walkable/pedestrian 36 <br />friendly destination. He supported the clock tower and storm water pond amenities. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Jay Demma, Stantec, discussed a retail/commercial development in Golden Valley along 39 <br />Winnetka and Highway 55. He explained that this may be a nice vision for this parcel. He 40 <br />discussed how a walking path could be created within the development. 41 <br /> 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.