Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA May 9, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />at the end, would be $16.5 million noting that with depreciation of the account, it would be free 214 <br />of being necessary for defraying costs by 2019 and would be able to stand on its own. He 215 <br />explained that his reason for bringing this up is because the numbers have been presented noting 216 <br />that the total value of the land and assets along with the fixed assets, would be, at a minimum, 217 <br />$26.2 million in equity. He stated that he is curious as to why the City of Mounds View would 218 <br />let this jewel slip through their fingers when the numbers from Staff show a worth of $26 million 219 <br />in TIF alone. 220 <br /> 221 <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, acknowledged that Medtronic is a fabulous company 222 <br />adding that she has a couple of questions. She noted that Medtronic has a beautiful campus 223 <br />located in Fridley and asked why they did not expand in Fridley. She stated that she did some of 224 <br />her own research on the assessment agreement with Anoka County stating that she found out that 225 <br />there were areas available but that Medtronic did not want to pay the square footage amount. She 226 <br />stated that it was her understanding that certain areas were also removed from the equation and 227 <br />asked if this was true. She stated that rumor has it that they were only paying $80 per square foot 228 <br />on the property and that Fridley could have sued. She asked for further clarification on the 229 <br />assessment agreement. She asked for clarification on the calculations used to determine the park 230 <br />dedication fees noting that the agreed amount is $600,000 and with a property valued at $8.5 231 <br />million, based on the 10-percent calculation, shouldn’t the amount for park dedication fees 232 <br />actually be $850,000. She asked if there were legal reasons that they were not able to use the 10-233 <br />percent calculations noting that other businesses had to pay a 10-percent park dedication fee. She 234 <br />stated that in summary she would like to know why Medtronic did not expand in Fridley; How 235 <br />were they able to negotiate the conference and café square footage; and how did they come up 236 <br />with the park dedication fee numbers. 237 <br /> 238 <br />Mr. McCombs explained that there was not enough room in Fridley for the size of the facility 239 <br />they want to build. He stated that the initial project would be 840,000 square feet noting that 240 <br />they would require additional space to expand up to 1.5 million square feet. 241 <br /> 242 <br />Mr. McComb further explained that corporations have to plan for their future and Medtronic is 243 <br />trying to project out how best to take care of their growth over the next ten to twenty years. He 244 <br />stated that this move would help to address their growth needs over the next few years. He 245 <br />referenced the assessment agreement in Anoka stating that there are different ways used in how 246 <br />they calculate square footage, which was part of their discussion, through mediators, with Anoka. 247 <br /> He stated that through these discussions both parties agreed to numbers that were deemed 248 <br />appropriate for that site. 249 <br /> 250 <br />City Administrator Ulrich acknowledged that the park dedication is less than the 10-percent used 251 <br />as a standard for smaller projects. He acknowledged that there were legal issues and explained 252 <br />that Staff did review other Communities to help determine the percentage that would be used, on 253 <br />average, to determine park dedication fees in a project of this size. He stated that Staff is willing 254 <br />to share the information if anyone is interested in reviewing. 255