My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-2003
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
07-14-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:51 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 2:48:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/14/2003
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
7/14/2003
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA June 9, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br /> 46 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Staff had obtained bids for the soil 47 <br />borings and provided the pricing information to the EDA. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Commissioner Marty arrived at 6:37 p.m. 50 <br /> 51 <br />Vice President Stigney asked whether the TIF funds to be used were the excess TIF Funds or the 52 <br />Community Development Funds. 53 <br /> 54 <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated that the City would be utilizing dollars from the 55 <br />EDA account funded through the TIF districts. 56 <br /> 57 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 03-EDA-58 <br />174, a Resolution Approving the Contract Award for Geotechnical Exploration for a Residential 59 <br />Development on Lots 34 through 50 on County Road H2. 60 <br /> 61 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried 62 <br /> 63 <br />7. REPORTS 64 <br /> 65 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Staff was asked to define a set of 66 <br />criteria for selecting a developer. He then provided the information to the EDA and reviewed it 67 <br />with them. He also noted that Dave Regel is no longer interested in being included in the project. 68 <br /> 69 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman reviewed the list of seven questions that were 70 <br />posed to the developers and compared their answers to those questions. He then asked whether 71 <br />the EDA felt the information was adequate and whether the EDA was prepared to choose a 72 <br />developer or wished to obtain further information. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Gary Nordness representing Procraft addressed the EDA and reviewed their plans for the project. 75 <br /> 76 <br />Commissioner Marty indicated he liked concept plan A and asked who owned the property 77 <br />behind the existing home in plan B. 78 <br /> 79 <br />The developer indicated that Mr. Vik owns that property and has expressed an interest in selling 80 <br />it. 81 <br /> 82 <br />Jim Claremont of Homes by James addressed the EDA and provided a brief history on himself 83 <br />and his company along with over viewing his plans for the project. 84 <br /> 85 <br />Vice President Stigney asked for Staff’s recommendation on choice of developer. 86 <br /> 87
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.