My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-2004 SPECIAL
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
12-06-2004 SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:31 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 8:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/6/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Given that, fees were established. Staff believes that the methodology for <br />assigning these rates, which have been employed since the early 1990’s, do not <br />perform as intended. Some residents / property owners have also expressed a <br />dissatisfaction with the current methodology for assigning these charges. <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUES WITH THE CURRENT SYSTEM <br /> Section 908.03, subdivision 2 of the City Code calls for “the surface water <br />management fee for residential, town-homes/condominiums, apartments <br />and mobile home parks will be determined on a per-household basis rather <br />than a per acre basis”. The current adopted fee schedule assigns charges <br />based on acreage for medium density and high density residential, as well <br />as mobile home parks. These documents should be consistent. <br /> <br /> The rates for all non-residential property including business, commercial, <br />and industrial properties are adjusted with a “utility factor” (see section <br />908.03 subdivision 3.b. of the attached City Code). This methodology <br />assumes that all properties with a particular land generate the same burden <br />on the City’s Storm Water System. Staff contends that is not accurate and is <br />an oversimplified way to assign storm water charges. <br /> <br /> The current rate structure for all non-residential property uses the total gross <br />area as a multiplier, regardless of what the land is. Example: the total area <br />(in acres including wetlands, ponds, City ponding easement areas) is <br />multiplied by the utility factor. Staff, and several property owners, believe that <br />assigning storm water charges to property containing wetlands, ponds, or <br />City ponding areas places an unjustified additional financial burden on these <br />properties. This is especially true in cases where a wetland or pond that the <br />City is utilizing and discharging storm water to is on private property. <br /> <br /> <br />ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES – Based on the Current System <br /> A 10,000 square foot building on 2 acres will generate the same <br />amount of storm water runoff regardless of whether its land use is a <br />residential business or industrial. However, the residential business <br />use will pay 28% more in storm water utility fees than the industrial <br />use. <br /> <br /> Two parcels eight-acres (8ac.) in size with the same land use will <br />pay the same storm water utility charge. However one parcel <br />maybe vacant or have a large wetland occupying most of the lot <br />and generate very little storm water runoff whereas the other parcel <br />may contain a large building with a large parking lot thus have a lot <br />of impervious area, consequently generating more storm water <br />runoff. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.