My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:23 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 9:38:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/10/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br />With the increased precipitation in 2002, groundwater levels have risen higher <br />than historical levels. Homes that unlawfully have their sump pumps connected <br />to the sanitary sewer system then contribute much higher volumes of flow. <br /> <br />The prohibition of discharge of storm water to the City’s sanitary sewer system <br />was added to the City Code in 1988. Since most of the homes in Mounds View <br />were constructed prior to the date, there are no records of how sump pumps, <br />floor drains, or roof drains are connected. The best, and perhaps the only, way to <br />determine if there is an unlawful discharge of storm water is to inspect the <br />plumbing of each property. <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the City Council consider an addition to the City’s <br />Ordinance (See EXHIBIT B). This is a draft Section 907.06 of the City Code. <br />Subdivisions 1 through 9 were added. The changes would implement a program <br />to have all City properties inspected to confirm that there is no unlawful discharge <br />into the sewer system. In the event that a property wishes not to allow the City to <br />perform an inspection, a surcharge would be added to their quarterly utility bill. <br />Example program: <br />• Adopt a revised ordinance. <br />• Hire an inspector for a period of two years. <br />• Inform residents of the revised ordinance. <br />• Give property owners about 18months to rectify any unlawful discharges. <br />• Include financial incentives, if the Council chooses. <br />• Property owners contact inspector to schedule inspection during the first <br />18 months <br />• After 18 months, a surcharge will be added to the utility bill of all non- <br />inspected property. <br /> <br />This is simple a concept program and draft ordinance intended to foster discussion <br />with the City Council. The 2003 Street Improvement Project was the catalyst for <br />looking into possible ways to address the storm water inflow problem. The <br />thought was that if there are known properties currently discharging sump pump <br />water into the sanitary sewer, perhaps with the 2003 Street Improvement Project <br />the City should look at providing a storm sewer lead (service) into which <br />properties can connect. This would be a PVC pipe which connect into the City’s <br />storm sewer system. It would run a few feet below grade and several feet behind <br />the curb. <br /> <br />The street project will proceed independent of the proposed storm water <br />discharge elimination program. Staff and the City engineering consultant will <br />review sewer tapes to identify potential problem areas. Staff will also direct-mail a <br />questionnaire to properties in the street project area to see if more problem areas <br />can be determined. Armed with this information, storm sewer lead would be <br />added to the project where feasible. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.