My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/05/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/05/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:08 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 10:55:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/27/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Eyler CC Report <br />May 27, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />As stated on the previous page, the proposed request fully complies with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. The neighborhood has many large lots of this same size so the oversized garage <br />would not appear too large for the lot. The garage would not depreciate the area and in fact <br />would bring added value to the property and would have a positive impact to the tax base. <br />While many homes in the area still have the original, small garages, a growing number of <br />properties in the area are making similar improvements. As for demonstrated need for such <br />a use, the Eylers’ letter expresses in great detail their need. <br /> <br />Code Requirements <br /> <br />Subdivision 6 of Section 1106.04 lists the conditions under which a conditional use permit <br />for an over-sized garage can be issued. These are as follows: <br /> <br />a. The accessory building must conform with other Sections of the Code <br /> <br />b. The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one (1) lot cannot exceed <br />one thousand four hundred (1,800) square feet. <br /> <br />c. The building shall be designed and maintained to provide a uniform appearance with <br />the dwelling unit. <br /> <br />d. The width of the building cannot exceed thirty-five feet (35'). <br /> <br />e. The building shall be a permanent structure. <br /> <br />f. Should the use for which the permit was granted be changed, the permit shall be <br />subject to reconsideration, revocation or other action. <br /> <br />All of these conditions are satisfied with this request. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the CUP after a <br />revision was made to the dimensions or the garage. The Planning Commission’s resolution <br />is attached for the Council’s review. The Planning Commission recommended that the <br />second curb cut be eliminated from the property as a condition of the CUP approval. That <br />requirement remains in the Council resolution yet may be removed at the Council’s <br />discretion. The applicants would prefer to retain the second curb cut. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.