My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:25 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:02:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/9/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/9/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LandCor Report <br />June 9, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2A. Parking <br /> <br />The PUD establishes the parking requirement for an office use at one space per 250 square <br />feet. The proposed office would consist of a maximum 15,000 square feet of gross space. <br />With that much area, a total of 60 parking spaces would be required. ADA requirements <br />indicate that of the 60 spaces, three need to be handicap accessible. The plans show a total <br />of 64 spaces, three of which are marked handicapped. The plans are consistent with the <br />PUD and with City Code. <br /> <br />3A. Access & Circulation <br /> <br />There is one access driveway shown from Long Lake Road; no access is shown onto County <br />Road 10. The absence of an access onto County Highway 10 is consistent with the goals <br />established in the corridor redevelopment and revitalization plan adopted by the City Council. <br />The Long Lake Road access is offset to the north of Moundsview Drive by about 100 feet. <br />No traffic conflicts would be anticipated because of this. The circulation within the <br />development is good and there is sufficient space in the drive aisles and adequate space <br />provided to back out of all parking spaces. <br /> <br />4A. Lighting <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a photometric analysis of the site and the foot-candle readings <br />comply with Code requirements. The plans do not, however, indicate pole height or provide <br />a graphic of the fixtures to be used. These should be added to the final plan set provided to <br />staff upon City Council approval. The attached resolution includes this provision. <br /> <br />5A. Drainage <br /> <br />The plans indicate that the site would be serviced by a series of catch basins linked together <br />by a storm sewer which empties into the existing NURP pond at the rear of the property. <br />(The existing pond was constructed with the original development to accommodate the future <br />build-out of the site. Permits do however need to be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed <br />District before the City will issue any building permits for the project. The applicant and any <br />utility subcontractors shall meet with the Public Works department for final utility plan <br />approval. <br /> <br />6A. Garbage Enclosure <br /> <br />As shown on the site plan, the garbage enclosure would be located on the south side of the <br />property. No details were provided regarding the enclosure’s construction, however the PUD <br />indicates that the enclosure shall be of the same construction as the building with solid, <br />opaque, latching gates. The developer confirms that this is their intent. Chain link is not an <br />acceptable gate material. The details should be added to the final plan set provided to staff <br />upon City Council approval. The attached resolution includes this provision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.