My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:25 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:02:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/9/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/9/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LandCor Report <br />June 9, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Parking Lot Setbacks <br /> <br />Front (Co. Hwy. 10.): 30 feet * 30 feet Yes <br />Front (Edgewood Dr.): 20 feet * 20 feet Yes <br />Rear (south): 30 feet * 60 feet Yes <br /> <br />* It is unclear what the intended parking lot setbacks are. Based upon reasonable <br />assumptions, staff believes all setbacks to be satisfied. <br /> <br />2B. Parking <br /> <br />The PUD establishes the parking requirement for the restaurant / retail uses as one space <br />per 100 square feet. The proposed multi-tenant building would consist of a maximum 7,785 <br />square feet of gross floor area. With that much area, a total of 78 parking spaces would be <br />required. ADA requirements indicate that of the 78 spaces, four need to be handicap <br />accessible. The plans show a total of 93 spaces, three of which are marked as <br />handicapped. The amount of parking provided complies with the PUD however one <br />additional handicap accessible stall should be shown on the plans. The Site Plan shall be <br />revised to show the one additional handicap stall on the final plan set provided to staff upon <br />City Council approval. The attached resolution includes this provision. <br /> <br />3B. Access & Circulation <br /> <br />There is one access driveway shown from Edgewood Drive; no access is shown onto County <br />Road 10. As with Outparcel A, the absence of an access onto County Highway 10 is <br />consistent with the goals established in the corridor redevelopment and revitalization plan <br />adopted by the City Council. The site has good circulation and drive aisle widths are <br />sufficient. <br /> <br />4B. Lighting <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a photometric analysis of the site and the foot-candle readings <br />comply with Code requirements. The plans do not, however, indicate pole height or provide <br />a graphic of the fixtures to be used. These should be added to the final plan set provided to <br />staff upon City Council approval. The attached resolution includes this provision. <br /> <br />5B. Drainage <br /> <br />The plans indicate that the site would be serviced by a series of catch basins linked together <br />by storm sewer which terminate into the existing storm sewers under Edgewood Drive. <br />Permits would need to be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District before the City will <br />issue any building permits for the project. The applicant and any utility subcontractors shall <br />meet with the Public Works department for final utility plan approval prior to construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.