Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Goettsch Council Report <br />June 23, 2003 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Again, as stated on the first page of this report, the proposed request fully complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The neighborhood has many lots of this same size and the proposed <br />garage satisfies the maximum rear yard coverage threshold, which was established to <br />ensure that 80% of all backyard areas would remain greenspace. While the proposed <br />garage will be 448 square feet larger than the existing garage, neither property to the north <br />or south should be impacted by the proposal. A privacy fence buffers the property to the <br />south and the property to the north has its garage along the common property line. The <br />properties to the rear would be most visually impacted by the proposed garage however it <br />will be less than three feet wider than the original garage so it should “appear” only slightly <br />larger from a profile perspective. From the front view, relocating the RV that is currently <br />parked on the driveway into the new garage would be an improvement everyone would <br />notice. <br /> <br />It is not anticipated that the garage would depreciate the area and in fact should bring added <br />value to the property and should have a positive impact to the tax base. While many homes <br />in the area still have the original, small garages, a growing number of properties in the area <br />are making similar improvements. As for demonstrated need for such a use, I have visited <br />the property and can personally testify as to the Goettsch’s need for the additional space. <br /> <br />Section 1103.06 refers to the location of accessory buildings in side and rear yards. The <br />proposed garage satisfies this requirement. Section 1106.03 refers to specific standards <br />such as height, area, setbacks, coverage ratios, use requirements, total number of <br />accessory buildings allowed and exterior siding requirements, all of which are satisfied with <br />this request. All of the requirements addressed above would be satisfied. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the CUP. The <br />Planning Commission’s resolution is attached for the Council’s review. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Hold the public hearing and consider all testimony regarding the request. Based on the <br />above information and the site plan presented for consideration, the Planning Commission <br />and staff recommend approval of the requested conditional use permit for a 1,148 square <br />foot garage at 5220 Edgewood Drive, subject to stipulations. Resolution 6039 is attached for <br />the Council’s action if it is concurrence with the recommendation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Interim City Clerk/Administrator <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Application <br />2. Site Plan <br />3. Zoning Map <br />4. Location Map <br />5. Photographic Documentation