Agenda Packets - 2003/09/08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council August 25, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 4 M. Cancel a Public Hearing Set for 7:10 p.m. on Monday, September 8, 2003 to 1 Receive Public Input and Pass Upon a Special Assessment Levy for Street Repairs 2 at 7832 Bona Road 3 N. Establish an Executive Session Immediately After the Council Meeting to Discuss 4 Current Litigation 5 6 Council Member Marty requested that Item H be removed for discussion. 7 8 Council Member Stigney requested that Item B be removed for discussion. 9 10 Council Member Quick asked if there were litigation cases to be discussed. 11 12 City Attorney Riggs indicated that was correct. 13 14 MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Approve Consent Agenda Items A, C, D, E, F, G, I, J, K, 15 L, M, and N as Presented. 16 17 Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 18 19 Council Member Stigney asked that Resolution 6071 be read. He then asked why the full step 20 increase after six months and now a full step increase after one year and noted that was an 21 exception to the City’s policy. 22 23 Council Member Stigney read Resolution 6071. 24 25 Council Member Stigney indicated he does not understand how the City hires employees with 26 circumstances that are exceptions to the personnel policy and in the future he would like the 27 policy followed more closely. He then indicated that he would like information on how a 28 satisfactory job performance determination is made because there were questions recently with 29 the performance of this employee on two occasions. 30 31 Community Development Director Ericson indicated that generally speaking the evaluation 32 would be less than satisfactory if an employee’s performance is less than what is expected from 33 them. He then said that an issue raised by a business owner or one mistake does not warrant an 34 unsatisfactory rating as during the evaluation the big picture should be looked at and this 35 employee was rated satisfactory or higher. 36 37 City Administrator Ulrich indicated that this employee has met the satisfactory requirements and 38 if it is a case where an employee has individual issues those issues are addressed but if 90 or 95% 39 of the work is satisfactory or above then they do the majority of the work most of the time to a 40 level that meets or exceeds the city requirements and receive a satisfactory rating. 41 42 Council Member Stigney indicated his question was not to this specific employee but in general 43 how the City establishes the satisfactory or higher rating. 44 45