My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/10/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/10/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:33 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:29:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 22, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />because the survey was suggested by park and recreation and there were park and recreation 1 <br />questions there were discussions of using park dedication funds for the survey. She further 2 <br />commented that she feels it would be appropriate to survey the community to get input from 3 <br />those that are new to the community since the last survey was done. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Marty asked how much money is in the park dedication fund. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that his recollection is that there is $400,000 to $450,000 in 8 <br />the park dedication fund. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Stigney commented that this was an item to be saved in the 2004 budget but 11 <br />has just been swapped to the 2003 budget. He then said that he feels there are cheaper 12 <br />alternatives for a survey and he is kind of surprised that this company would quote a price for the 13 <br />survey when they refused to do a quote under the previous administration. He also said he does 14 <br />not think this is the way to go and would suggested using Mounds View Matters or a mass 15 <br />mailing to save money. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that he thinks the question of bonding for development within 18 <br />the parks should be put on a referendum to the voters as well as the question of whether there 19 <br />should be a golf course or what should be done with a golf course to see what the residents want 20 <br />to do. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Council Member Gunn indicated there would be other questions added to the survey not just park 23 <br />and recreation questions it would cover all aspects of the City. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the bottom line is the main question being asked by park and 26 <br />recreation is would you support a bond issue for park and recreation. He then said that if it has 27 <br />nothing to do with cost why are they asking if residents would support a bond issue. He further 28 <br />suggested saving the cost of the survey and add it to the referendum along with the golf course 29 <br />questions. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Mr. Werner agreed that the questions should be added to the referendum and let the residents 32 <br />decide what they want. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Mayor Linke indicated the City could not add anything to the referendum due to timing. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mr. Werner commented that every year the City gets into the same issue of being too late. 37 <br /> 38 <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated the total cost for the special election is $12,000 to $14,000 39 <br />and that is to be split between the City and the school district. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Quick commented that the only way the City can truly get a slice of the true 42 <br />opinion is by doing a professional survey. 43 <br /> 44 <br />A resident in the audience disagreed. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.